Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMIAX vs VITSX
NMIAX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts NMIAX vs VITSX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
Price$27.80
Change+$0.32 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets507.6M
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$143.69
Change+$1.51 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82T
NMIAX vs VITSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMIAX vs. VITSX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMIAX is a Buy and VITSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 1.82T vs. NMIAX (508M). VITSX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: VITSX (1.29) vs NMIAX (0.72). NMIAX was incepted earlier than VITSX: NMIAX (29 years) vs VITSX (28 years). NMIAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). NMIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: NMIAX (2000) vs VITSX (5000000). VITSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.97 vs. NMIAX (-1.71). VITSX return over 5 years is better than : 80.96 vs. NMIAX (12.49).
| NMIAX | VITSX | NMIAX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.03 | 2,767% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.03 | 4,100% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.758 | 0.833 | -91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 508M | 1.82T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.29 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.71 | 10.97 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.66 | 40.35 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.49 | 80.96 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.73 | 180.49 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement