Ad is loading...
NMIAX vs VITSX
NMIAX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts NMIAX vs VITSX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
Price$24.41
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets478.59M
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$125.99
Change+$0.29 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7T
NMIAX vs VITSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMIAX vs. VITSX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMIAX is a Buy and VITSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 1.7T vs. NMIAX (479M). VITSX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: VITSX (1.36) vs NMIAX (0.75). NMIAX was incepted earlier than VITSX: NMIAX (29 years) vs VITSX (28 years). NMIAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). NMIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: NMIAX (2000) vs VITSX (5000000). VITSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.35 vs. NMIAX (-5.88). VITSX return over 5 years is better than : 80.96 vs. NMIAX (15.13).
| NMIAX | VITSX | NMIAX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.03 | 2,767% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.03 | 4,100% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.895 | -10.854 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 479M | 1.7T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.36 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.88 | 4.35 | -135% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.61 | 17.55 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.13 | 80.96 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.71 | 146.15 | 15% |