Ad is loading...
NMIAX vs VITSX
NMIAX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts NMIAX vs VITSX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
Price$26.19
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets510.75M
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$135.34
Change-$0.08 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72T
NMIAX vs VITSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMIAX vs. VITSX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMIAX is a Buy and VITSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 1.72T vs. NMIAX (511M). VITSX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: VITSX (1.37) vs NMIAX (0.75). NMIAX was incepted earlier than VITSX: NMIAX (29 years) vs VITSX (28 years). NMIAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). NMIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: NMIAX (2000) vs VITSX (5000000). VITSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. NMIAX (-3.93). VITSX return over 5 years is better than : 89.20 vs. NMIAX (17.39).
| NMIAX | VITSX | NMIAX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.03 | 2,767% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.03 | 4,100% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.417 | -4.018 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 511M | 1.72T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.37 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.93 | 7.95 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.35 | 40.08 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.39 | 89.20 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.30 | 165.78 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...