Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMIAX vs VITSX
NMIAX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts NMIAX vs VITSX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
Price$28.17
Change+$0.08 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets487.2M
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$150.53
Change+$0.91 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
NMIAX vs VITSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMIAX vs. VITSX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMIAX is a Buy and VITSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. NMIAX (487M). VITSX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: VITSX (1.22) vs NMIAX (0.73). NMIAX was incepted earlier than VITSX: NMIAX (29 years) vs VITSX (28 years). NMIAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). NMIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: NMIAX (2000) vs VITSX (5000000). VITSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.81 vs. NMIAX (-1.32). VITSX return over 5 years is better than : 89.12 vs. NMIAX (23.22).
| NMIAX | VITSX | NMIAX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.03 | 2,767% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.03 | 4,033% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.558 | 6.125 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 487M | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.22 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.32 | 11.81 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.87 | 61.25 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.22 | 89.12 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.37 | 190.46 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement