Ad is loading...
NMIAX vs VSTSX
NMIAX vs VSTSX Comparison
Open Charts NMIAX vs VSTSX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
Price$26.19
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets510.75M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Instl Sel
Price$266.48
Change-$0.16 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72T
NMIAX vs VSTSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMIAX vs. VSTSX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMIAX is a Buy and VSTSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSTSX has more cash in the bank: 1.72T vs. NMIAX (511M). VSTSX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: VSTSX (1.38) vs NMIAX (0.75). NMIAX was incepted earlier than VSTSX: NMIAX (29 years) vs VSTSX (9 years). NMIAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than VSTSX (0.01). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. VSTSX (2.00). NMIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSTSX: NMIAX (2000) vs VSTSX (5000000000). VSTSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.97 vs. NMIAX (-3.93). VSTSX return over 5 years is better than : 89.31 vs. NMIAX (17.39).
| NMIAX | VSTSX | NMIAX / VSTSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.01 | 8,300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.01 | 12,300% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.417 | -4.010 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 511M | 1.72T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.38 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.93 | 7.97 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.35 | 40.17 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.39 | 89.31 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...