Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMIAX vs VTSAX
NMIAX vs VTSAX Comparison
Open Charts NMIAX vs VTSAX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
Price$29.95
Change+$0.17 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets484.19M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
Price$158.59
Change+$0.73 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95T
NMIAX vs VTSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMIAX vs. VTSAX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMIAX is a Buy and VTSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSAX has more cash in the bank: 1.95T vs. NMIAX (484M). VTSAX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: VTSAX (1.16) vs NMIAX (0.70). NMIAX was incepted earlier than VTSAX: NMIAX (29 years) vs VTSAX (25 years). NMIAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than VTSAX (0.04). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VTSAX (2.00). NMIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSAX: NMIAX (2000) vs VTSAX (3000). VTSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.11 vs. NMIAX (5.42). VTSAX return over 5 years is better than : 89.10 vs. NMIAX (25.06).
| NMIAX | VTSAX | NMIAX / VTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.04 | 2,075% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.04 | 3,025% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.668 | 11.985 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 484M | 1.95T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.16 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 17.11 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.85 | 67.09 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.06 | 89.10 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.83 | 231.06 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement