| NML | TPYP | NML / TPYP | |
| Gain YTD | 1.699 | 6.810 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 538M | 702M | 77% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.40 | 495% |
| Turnover | 27.00 | 9.00 | 300% |
| Yield | 7.41 | 4.07 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| NML | TPYP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 79% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NML and EPD have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NML and EPD's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPYP has been closely correlated with KMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TPYP jumps, then KMI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TPYP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPYP | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| KMI - TPYP | 86% Closely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| OKE - TPYP | 85% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| WMB - TPYP | 84% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| DTM - TPYP | 82% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| TRGP - TPYP | 80% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
More | ||||