Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMMDX vs TFBIX
NMMDX vs TFBIX Comparison
Open Charts NMMDX vs TFBIX
Nuveen MD Municipal Bond I
Price$9.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.98M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond I
Price$9.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.28B
NMMDX vs TFBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMMDX vs. TFBIX commentary
Sep 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMMDX is a Hold and TFBIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBIX has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. NMMDX (234M). NMMDX pays higher dividends than TFBIX: NMMDX (3.77) vs TFBIX (3.25). NMMDX was incepted earlier than TFBIX: NMMDX (34 years) vs TFBIX (8 years). NMMDX (0.63) is less costly to investors than TFBIX (0.41). NMMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. TFBIX (17.30). NMMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBIX: NMMDX (100000) vs TFBIX (500000). TFBIX (-0.73) and NMMDX (-0.74) have marching annual gain over last year. TFBIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.53 vs. NMMDX (1.54).
| NMMDX | TFBIX | NMMDX / TFBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.41 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.41 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.113 | -1.255 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 234M | 2.28B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.77 | 3.25 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.74 | -0.73 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.32 | 7.68 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.54 | 2.53 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.10 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers