Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMMDX vs TFBIX
NMMDX vs TFBIX Comparison
Open Charts NMMDX vs TFBIX
Nuveen MD Municipal Bond I
Price$9.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets238.12M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond I
Price$9.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
NMMDX vs TFBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMMDX vs. TFBIX commentary
Jul 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMMDX is a Hold and TFBIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBIX has more cash in the bank: 2.25B vs. NMMDX (238M). NMMDX (3.71) and TFBIX (3.53) have matching dividends . NMMDX was incepted earlier than TFBIX: NMMDX (33 years) vs TFBIX (8 years). NMMDX (0.63) is less costly to investors than TFBIX (0.41). NMMDX (18.00) and TFBIX (17.30) have comparable annual turnover. NMMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBIX: NMMDX (100000) vs TFBIX (500000). TFBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.19 vs. NMMDX (-1.34). TFBIX return over 5 years is better than : 0.90 vs. NMMDX (0.07).
| NMMDX | TFBIX | NMMDX / TFBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.41 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.41 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.576 | -2.471 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 238M | 2.25B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.71 | 3.53 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.34 | -1.19 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.16 | 5.03 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.07 | 0.90 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement