Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMMDX vs TFBVX
NMMDX vs TFBVX Comparison
Open Charts NMMDX vs TFBVX
Nuveen MD Municipal Bond I
Price$9.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets238.12M
T. Rowe Price Virginia Tax Free Bond I
Price$10.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
NMMDX vs TFBVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMMDX vs. TFBVX commentary
Jul 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMMDX is a Hold and TFBVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBVX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. NMMDX (238M). NMMDX pays higher dividends than TFBVX: NMMDX (3.71) vs TFBVX (3.48). NMMDX was incepted earlier than TFBVX: NMMDX (33 years) vs TFBVX (8 years). NMMDX (0.63) is less costly to investors than TFBVX (0.42). TFBVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.10 vs. NMMDX (18.00). NMMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBVX: NMMDX (100000) vs TFBVX (500000). NMMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.34 vs. TFBVX (-2.15). NMMDX return over 5 years is better than : 0.07 vs. TFBVX (-1.19).
| NMMDX | TFBVX | NMMDX / TFBVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.42 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.42 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.576 | -3.262 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 238M | 1.28B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.71 | 3.48 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.34 | -2.15 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.16 | 4.06 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.07 | -1.19 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement