NMR
Price
$6.48
Change
-$0.14 (-2.11%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
18.15B
65 days until earnings call
NRSCF
Price
$6.63
Change
-$0.18 (-2.65%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
12.83B
Ad is loading...

NMR vs NRSCF

Header iconNMR vs NRSCF Comparison
Open Charts NMR vs NRSCFBanner chart's image
Nomura Holdings
Price$6.48
Change-$0.14 (-2.11%)
Volume$336.28K
Capitalization18.15B
Nomura Holdings
Price$6.63
Change-$0.18 (-2.65%)
Volume$150
Capitalization12.83B
NMR vs NRSCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
NMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMR vs. NRSCF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To understand the difference between Nomura Holdings Inc. - ADR (NMR) vs. Nomura Holdings Inc. (NRSCF) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR

ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (NMR: $6.48 vs. NRSCF: $6.63)
Brand notoriety: NMR and NRSCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMR: 60% vs. NRSCF: 102%
Market capitalization -- NMR: $18.15B vs. NRSCF: $12.83B
NMR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $18.15B. NRSCF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $12.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNRSCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NMR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NRSCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NMR and NRSCF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NMR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

NMR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -4.14% price change this week, while NRSCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +12.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMR is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.51% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMR($18.1B) has a higher market cap than NRSCF($12.8B). NMR has higher P/E ratio than NRSCF: NMR (25.08) vs NRSCF (18.52). NRSCF YTD gains are higher at: 15.338 vs. NMR (11.917). NRSCF has less debt than NMR: NRSCF (11.4T) vs NMR (13.16T). NMR has higher revenues than NRSCF: NMR (1.27T) vs NRSCF (1.12T).
NMRNRSCFNMR / NRSCF
Capitalization18.1B12.8B141%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.91715.33878%
P/E Ratio25.0818.52135%
Revenue1.27T1.12T113%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt13.16T11.4T115%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMR vs NRSCF: Fundamental Ratings
NMR
NRSCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5362
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4539
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9696
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMR's Valuation (33) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NRSCF (33) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NRSCF (62) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's SMR Rating (1) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NRSCF (1) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

NRSCF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as NMR (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that NRSCF’s stock grew similarly to NMR’s over the last 12 months.

NRSCF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as NMR (96) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that NRSCF’s stock grew similarly to NMR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFEBX50.45-0.38
-0.75%
MFS Value B
GHTRX13.20-0.11
-0.83%
Goldman Sachs International T/M Eq R6
NEXTX31.38-0.47
-1.48%
Shelton Sustainable Equity Investor
MGGLX34.35-0.78
-2.22%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Opp L
IVVIX19.46-0.45
-2.26%
Macquarie Smid Cap Core Fund Class I

NMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMR has been loosely correlated with DSEEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMR jumps, then DSEEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMR
1D Price
Change %
NMR100%
-2.11%
DSEEY - NMR
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
IX - NMR
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
JPXGY - NMR
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.93%
GS - NMR
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.59%
EVR - NMR
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.67%
More

NRSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NRSCF and NMR have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NRSCF and NMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRSCF
1D Price
Change %
NRSCF100%
-2.57%
NMR - NRSCF
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
CCORF - NRSCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.03%
MQBKY - NRSCF
18%
Poorly correlated
-3.06%
MCQEF - NRSCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPPTF - NRSCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-5.06%
More