Advertisement
NMR vs NRSCF
To understand the difference between Nomura Holdings Inc. - ADR (NMR) vs. Nomura Holdings Inc. (NRSCF) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NMR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNRSCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- NMR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NRSCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NMR’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NRSCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NMR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- NRSCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
NMR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -3.61% price change this week, while NRSCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -4.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -8.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
NMR is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-8.13% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| NMR | NRSCF | NMR / NRSCF | |
| Capitalization | 20.4B | 20.4B | 100% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.862 | 18.820 | 106% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.93 | 8.72 | 102% |
| Revenue | 1.76T | 1.76T | 100% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 16T | 16T | 100% |
NMR | NRSCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 1 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NRSCF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as NMR (22) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that NRSCF’s stock grew similarly to NMR’s over the last 12 months.
NMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NRSCF (60) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.
NMR's SMR Rating (1) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NRSCF (1) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.
NRSCF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as NMR (51) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that NRSCF’s stock grew similarly to NMR’s over the last 12 months.
NRSCF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as NMR (60) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that NRSCF’s stock grew similarly to NMR’s over the last 12 months.
| NMR | NRSCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 35% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 24% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 63% | 10 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 29% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 46% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XUDV | 25.84 | 0.13 | +0.51% |
| Franklin U.S. Dividend Mltplr Idx ETF | |||
| XLP | 77.10 | 0.33 | +0.43% |
| The Consumer Staples Sel SectSPDR® ETF | |||
| BFOR | 78.31 | 0.21 | +0.27% |
| Barron's 400 ETF | |||
| PDT | 12.86 | 0.01 | +0.08% |
| John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | |||
| GEMD | 42.53 | -0.03 | -0.08% |
| Goldman Sachs Access Emrg Mkts USD BdETF | |||
NMR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMR has been loosely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMR jumps, then SF could also see price increases.
NRSCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NRSCF and NMR have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NRSCF and NMR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NRSCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NRSCF | 100% | -3.87% | ||
| NMR - NRSCF | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
| CCORF - NRSCF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
| MQBKY - NRSCF | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
| MCQEF - NRSCF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NPPTF - NRSCF | 5% Poorly correlated | +4.09% | ||
More | ||||