NMR
Price
$6.95
Change
+$0.07 (+1.02%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
18.15B
82 days until earnings call
NRSCF
Price
$6.30
Change
-$0.41 (-6.11%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
12.83B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NMR vs NRSCF

Header iconNMR vs NRSCF Comparison
Open Charts NMR vs NRSCFBanner chart's image
Nomura Holdings
Price$6.95
Change+$0.07 (+1.02%)
Volume$335.44K
Capitalization18.15B
Nomura Holdings
Price$6.30
Change-$0.41 (-6.11%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization12.83B
NMR vs NRSCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMR vs. NRSCF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To understand the difference between Nomura Holdings Inc. - ADR (NMR) vs. Nomura Holdings Inc. (NRSCF) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR

ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (NMR: $6.95 vs. NRSCF: $6.30)
Brand notoriety: NMR and NRSCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMR: 64% vs. NRSCF: 16%
Market capitalization -- NMR: $18.15B vs. NRSCF: $12.83B
NMR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $18.15B. NRSCF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $12.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNRSCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NMR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NRSCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMR is a better buy in the long-term than NRSCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NRSCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NRSCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMR is a better buy in the short-term than NRSCF.

Price Growth

NMR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +4.51% price change this week, while NRSCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -6.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.99% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMR($18.1B) has a higher market cap than NRSCF($12.8B). NMR has higher P/E ratio than NRSCF: NMR (25.08) vs NRSCF (18.52). NMR YTD gains are higher at: 20.035 vs. NRSCF (9.680). NRSCF has less debt than NMR: NRSCF (11.4T) vs NMR (13.16T). NMR has higher revenues than NRSCF: NMR (1.27T) vs NRSCF (1.12T).
NMRNRSCFNMR / NRSCF
Capitalization18.1B12.8B141%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.0359.680207%
P/E Ratio25.0818.52135%
Revenue1.27T1.12T113%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt13.16T11.4T115%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMR vs NRSCF: Fundamental Ratings
NMR
NRSCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1898
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4858
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4451
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8085
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMR's Valuation (18) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NRSCF (20) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NRSCF (58) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's SMR Rating (1) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NRSCF (1) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NRSCF (51) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NRSCF (85) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMRNRSCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
33%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARKZ40.431.96
+5.09%
ARK 21Shares Active Ethereum FutsStgyETF
RWX27.690.03
+0.11%
SPDR® Dow Jones® International RelEstETF
SJB15.650.02
+0.10%
ProShares Short High Yield
FLQL65.020.01
+0.02%
Franklin US Large Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF
PQOC27.11N/A
N/A
PGIM NASDAQ-100 BUFFER 12 ETF - OCTOBER

NMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMR has been loosely correlated with DSEEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMR jumps, then DSEEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMR
1D Price
Change %
NMR100%
+1.02%
DSEEY - NMR
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.60%
GS - NMR
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
MS - NMR
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
SF - NMR
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
EVR - NMR
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
More

NRSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NRSCF and NMR have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NRSCF and NMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRSCF
1D Price
Change %
NRSCF100%
N/A
NMR - NRSCF
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
CCORF - NRSCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.05%
MQBKY - NRSCF
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
MCQEF - NRSCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPPTF - NRSCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+8.01%
More