Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUAX vs VITSX
NMUAX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts NMUAX vs VITSX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp A
Price$11.33
Change+$0.11 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets249.37M
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$155.88
Change+$1.36 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
NMUAX vs VITSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUAX vs. VITSX commentary
Sep 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUAX is a Buy and VITSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. NMUAX (249M). VITSX pays higher dividends than NMUAX: VITSX (1.17) vs NMUAX (0.00). NMUAX was incepted earlier than VITSX: NMUAX (16 years) vs VITSX (28 years). NMUAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). NMUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). NMUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: NMUAX (1000) vs VITSX (5000000). VITSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.85 vs. NMUAX (10.43). VITSX return over 5 years is better than : 83.72 vs. NMUAX (-32.98).
| NMUAX | VITSX | NMUAX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.03 | 4,167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.03 | 4,167% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.677 | 9.601 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 249M | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.17 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.43 | 16.85 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.50 | 61.81 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.98 | 83.72 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.00 | 230.61 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers