Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUAX vs VTSMX
NMUAX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts NMUAX vs VTSMX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp A
Price$11.37
Change+$0.03 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.13M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$159.25
Change+$0.69 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02T
NMUAX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUAX vs. VTSMX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUAX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 2.02T vs. NMUAX (248M). VTSMX pays higher dividends than NMUAX: VTSMX (1.04) vs NMUAX (0.00). NMUAX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: NMUAX (16 years) vs VTSMX (34 years). NMUAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). NMUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). NMUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: NMUAX (1000) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.79 vs. NMUAX (5.47). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 84.86 vs. NMUAX (-34.25).
| NMUAX | VTSMX | NMUAX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.14 | 893% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.14 | 893% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.144 | 13.012 | 86% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 248M | 2.02T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.04 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.47 | 13.79 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.27 | 76.02 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.25 | 84.86 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.17 | 225.10 | -12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement