Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUCX vs VITSX
NMUCX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs VITSX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
Price$10.51
Change+$0.08 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.34M
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$158.35
Change+$0.53 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05T
NMUCX vs VITSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. VITSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a Hold and VITSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 2.05T vs. NMUCX (243M). VITSX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: VITSX (1.12) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than VITSX: NMUCX (16 years) vs VITSX (28 years). NMUCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). NMUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). NMUCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: NMUCX (1000) vs VITSX (5000000). VITSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.80 vs. NMUCX (3.57). VITSX return over 5 years is better than : 77.65 vs. NMUCX (-41.67).
| NMUCX | VITSX | NMUCX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.03 | 6,667% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.03 | 6,667% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.444 | 11.964 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 243M | 2.05T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.57 | 10.80 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.47 | 63.87 | -16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -41.67 | 77.65 | -54% |
| Returns for 10 years | -36.05 | 214.37 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement