Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUCX vs VSTSX
NMUCX vs VSTSX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs VSTSX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
Price$10.66
Change-$0.06 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.48M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Instl Sel
Price$310.88
Change-$0.48 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95T
NMUCX vs VSTSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. VSTSX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a Buy and VSTSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSTSX has more cash in the bank: 1.95T vs. NMUCX (254M). VSTSX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: VSTSX (1.17) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than VSTSX: NMUCX (16 years) vs VSTSX (9 years). NMUCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than VSTSX (0.01). NMUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VSTSX (2.00). NMUCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSTSX: NMUCX (1000) vs VSTSX (5000000000). VSTSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.97 vs. NMUCX (11.04). VSTSX return over 5 years is better than : 92.67 vs. NMUCX (-34.84).
| NMUCX | VSTSX | NMUCX / VSTSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.01 | 20,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.01 | 20,000% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.857 | 12.000 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 254M | 1.95T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.17 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.04 | 17.97 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.24 | 64.55 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.84 | 92.67 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | -31.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement