Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUCX vs VTSAX
NMUCX vs VTSAX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs VTSAX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
Price$10.43
Change-$0.05 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.95M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
Price$157.80
Change-$1.10 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05T
NMUCX vs VTSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. VTSAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a Hold and VTSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSAX has more cash in the bank: 2.05T vs. NMUCX (245M). VTSAX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: VTSAX (1.11) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than VTSAX: NMUCX (16 years) vs VTSAX (25 years). NMUCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than VTSAX (0.04). NMUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSAX (2.00). NMUCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSAX: NMUCX (1000) vs VTSAX (3000). VTSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.10 vs. NMUCX (4.17). VTSAX return over 5 years is better than : 77.92 vs. NMUCX (-41.81).
| NMUCX | VTSAX | NMUCX / VTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.04 | 5,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.04 | 5,000% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.969 | 12.746 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 245M | 2.05T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.11 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.17 | 12.10 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.04 | 65.02 | -15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -41.81 | 77.92 | -54% |
| Returns for 10 years | -35.74 | 216.64 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers