Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUCX vs VTSMX
NMUCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs VTSMX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
Price$10.39
Change-$0.08 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.09M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$154.09
Change-$0.73 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
NMUCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. NMUCX (252M). VTSMX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: VTSMX (1.09) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: NMUCX (16 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). NMUCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). NMUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). NMUCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: NMUCX (1000) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.67 vs. NMUCX (9.52). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 81.40 vs. NMUCX (-37.68).
| NMUCX | VTSMX | NMUCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.14 | 1,429% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.14 | 1,429% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.864 | 9.848 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252M | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.52 | 14.67 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.74 | 56.62 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.68 | 81.40 | -46% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.29 | 220.16 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement