NNOMF
Price
$0.76
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
OEC
Price
$17.69
Change
+$0.21 (+1.20%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
11 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NNOMF vs OEC

Header iconNNOMF vs OEC Comparison
Open Charts NNOMF vs OECBanner chart's image
Nano One Materials
Price$0.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$21.89K
CapitalizationN/A
Orion SA
Price$17.69
Change+$0.21 (+1.20%)
Volume$294.19K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
NNOMF vs OEC Comparison Chart
Loading...
NNOMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
OEC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
NNOMF vs. OEC commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NNOMF is a StrongBuy and OEC is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (NNOMF: $0.80 vs. OEC: $17.69)
Brand notoriety: NNOMF and OEC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NNOMF: 44% vs. OEC: 59%
Market capitalization -- NNOMF: $261.42M vs. OEC: $1.36B
NNOMF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $261.42M. OEC’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $1.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NNOMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOEC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NNOMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OEC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OEC is a better buy in the long-term than NNOMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NNOMF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OEC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NNOMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OEC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OEC is a better buy in the short-term than NNOMF.

Price Growth

NNOMF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +3.00% price change this week, while OEC (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +4.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

OEC is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.25% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OEC($1.36B) has a higher market cap than NNOMF($261M). OEC YTD gains are higher at: -36.031 vs. NNOMF (-55.857). OEC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 327M vs. NNOMF (-18.35M). NNOMF has more cash in the bank: 40.1M vs. OEC (37.5M). NNOMF has less debt than OEC: NNOMF (1.12M) vs OEC (927M). OEC has higher revenues than NNOMF: OEC (1.89B) vs NNOMF (0).
NNOMFOECNNOMF / OEC
Capitalization261M1.36B19%
EBITDA-18.35M327M-6%
Gain YTD-55.857-36.031155%
P/E RatioN/A13.52-
Revenue01.89B-
Total Cash40.1M37.5M107%
Total Debt1.12M927M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NNOMF vs OEC: Fundamental Ratings
NNOMF
OEC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2419
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10081
SMR RATING
1..100
9855
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5664
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10039
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OEC's Valuation (47) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as NNOMF (52) in the null industry. This means that OEC’s stock grew similarly to NNOMF’s over the last 12 months.

OEC's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as NNOMF (100) in the null industry. This means that OEC’s stock grew similarly to NNOMF’s over the last 12 months.

OEC's SMR Rating (55) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NNOMF (98) in the null industry. This means that OEC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NNOMF’s over the last 12 months.

NNOMF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as OEC (64) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that NNOMF’s stock grew similarly to OEC’s over the last 12 months.

OEC's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NNOMF (100) in the null industry. This means that OEC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NNOMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NNOMFOEC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NNOMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
OEC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

NNOMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NNOMF has been loosely correlated with ECVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NNOMF jumps, then ECVT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NNOMF
1D Price
Change %
NNOMF100%
+4.01%
ECVT - NNOMF
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
TROX - NNOMF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
OEC - NNOMF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
CE - NNOMF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
OLN - NNOMF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
More

OEC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OEC has been closely correlated with CBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OEC jumps, then CBT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OEC
1D Price
Change %
OEC100%
+1.20%
CBT - OEC
71%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
ECVT - OEC
68%
Closely correlated
+1.52%
AVNT - OEC
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
EMN - OEC
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
WLK - OEC
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
More