NOA
Price
$20.49
Change
-$0.38 (-1.82%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
604.62M
25 days until earnings call
TDW
Price
$55.70
Change
+$0.33 (+0.60%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.81B
40 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NOA vs TDW

Header iconNOA vs TDW Comparison
Open Charts NOA vs TDWBanner chart's image
North American Construction Group
Price$20.49
Change-$0.38 (-1.82%)
Volume$26.07K
Capitalization604.62M
Tidewater
Price$55.70
Change+$0.33 (+0.60%)
Volume$1.08M
Capitalization4.81B
NOA vs TDW Comparison Chart
Loading...
NOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TDW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NOA vs. TDW commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOA is a Hold and TDW is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (NOA: $20.49 vs. TDW: $55.70)
Brand notoriety: NOA and TDW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NOA: 43% vs. TDW: 97%
Market capitalization -- NOA: $604.62M vs. TDW: $4.81B
NOA [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $604.62M. TDW’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $4.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NOA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTDW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NOA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TDW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NOA is a better buy in the long-term than TDW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NOA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TDW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NOA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TDW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TDW is a better buy in the short-term than NOA.

Price Growth

NOA (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +0.99% price change this week, while TDW (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +0.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

NOA is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

TDW is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+3.51% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TDW($4.81B) has a higher market cap than NOA($605M). TDW has higher P/E ratio than NOA: TDW (50.98) vs NOA (14.57). TDW YTD gains are higher at: 1.810 vs. NOA (-5.183). TDW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 316M vs. NOA (253M). TDW has more cash in the bank: 274M vs. NOA (88.6M). NOA (717M) and TDW (734M) have identical debt. TDW has higher revenues than NOA: TDW (1.01B) vs NOA (957M).
NOATDWNOA / TDW
Capitalization605M4.81B13%
EBITDA253M316M80%
Gain YTD-5.1831.810-286%
P/E Ratio14.5750.9829%
Revenue957M1.01B95%
Total Cash88.6M274M32%
Total Debt717M734M98%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOA vs TDW: Fundamental Ratings
NOA
TDW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
978
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3348
SMR RATING
1..100
5552
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4663
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NOA's Valuation (41) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as TDW (66). This means that NOA’s stock grew similarly to TDW’s over the last 12 months.

NOA's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as TDW (48). This means that NOA’s stock grew similarly to TDW’s over the last 12 months.

TDW's SMR Rating (52) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as NOA (55). This means that TDW’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

NOA's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as TDW (63). This means that NOA’s stock grew similarly to TDW’s over the last 12 months.

NOA's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TDW (98). This means that NOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than TDW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NOATDW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TDW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UYM25.090.39
+1.60%
ProShares Ultra Materials
PZT22.760.07
+0.31%
Invesco New York AMT-Free Muni Bd ETF
FMB50.890.09
+0.18%
First Trust Managed Municipal ETF
CARU28.86N/A
N/A
Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN
BOIL67.39-11.49
-14.57%
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas

NOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOA has been loosely correlated with WTTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOA jumps, then WTTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOA
1D Price
Change %
NOA100%
-1.82%
WTTR - NOA
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
VAL - NOA
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
TDW - NOA
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
OII - NOA
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
TS - NOA
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
More

TDW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TDW has been closely correlated with VAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TDW jumps, then VAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TDW
1D Price
Change %
TDW100%
+0.60%
VAL - TDW
68%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
OII - TDW
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
HLX - TDW
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
WFRD - TDW
60%
Loosely correlated
+5.34%
FTI - TDW
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
More