NODB
Price
$58.50
Change
-$0.06 (-0.10%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
150.44M
SPXXF
Price
$13.52
Change
+$5.74 (+73.78%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
128.77M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NODB vs SPXXF

Header iconNODB vs SPXXF Comparison
Open Charts NODB vs SPXXFBanner chart's image
North Dallas Bank & Trust Co. (TX)
Price$58.50
Change-$0.06 (-0.10%)
Volume$210
Capitalization150.44M
Sparebanken Nord Norge
Price$13.52
Change+$5.74 (+73.78%)
Volume$250
Capitalization128.77M
NODB vs SPXXF Comparison Chart in %
NODB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SPXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NODB vs. SPXXF commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NODB is a Hold and SPXXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (NODB: $58.50 vs. SPXXF: $13.52)
Brand notoriety: NODB and SPXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NODB: 72% vs. SPXXF: 19%
Market capitalization -- NODB: $150.44M vs. SPXXF: $128.77M
NODB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $150.44M. SPXXF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $128.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NODB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSPXXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NODB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SPXXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SPXXF is a better buy in the long-term than NODB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NODB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPXXF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NODB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SPXXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SPXXF is a better buy in the short-term than NODB.

Price Growth

NODB (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SPXXF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NODB($150M) has a higher market cap than SPXXF($129M). SPXXF YTD gains are higher at: 73.715 vs. NODB (30.476).
NODBSPXXFNODB / SPXXF
Capitalization150M129M116%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.47673.71541%
P/E Ratio37.30N/A-
Revenue41.7MN/A-
Total Cash14.6MN/A-
Total Debt5.45MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NODB vs SPXXF: Fundamental Ratings
NODB
SPXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86100
SMR RATING
1..100
81100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6513

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SPXXF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NODB (88). This means that SPXXF’s stock grew significantly faster than NODB’s over the last 12 months.

NODB's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as SPXXF (100). This means that NODB’s stock grew similarly to SPXXF’s over the last 12 months.

NODB's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as SPXXF (100). This means that NODB’s stock grew similarly to SPXXF’s over the last 12 months.

SPXXF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as NODB (51). This means that SPXXF’s stock grew similarly to NODB’s over the last 12 months.

NODB's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SPXXF (100). This means that NODB’s stock grew significantly faster than SPXXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NODBSPXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
8%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NODB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SPXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CPCAY6.850.02
+0.35%
Cathay Pacific Airways, Ltd.
SMNUF0.04N/A
N/A
Pt Sarana Menara Nusantara, Tbk
GFASY0.22N/A
N/A
Gafisa S.A.
APXYY0.32N/A
N/A
Appen Ltd.
NSRGF93.73-0.22
-0.24%
Nestle S.A.

NODB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NODB and CWBK have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NODB and CWBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NODB
1D Price
Change %
NODB100%
-0.10%
CWBK - NODB
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
SLBK - NODB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPFOF - NODB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCFB - NODB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPXXF - NODB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SPXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPXXF and FMFP have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPXXF and FMFP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPXXF
1D Price
Change %
SPXXF100%
N/A
FMFP - SPXXF
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.23%
RMBI - SPXXF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
NODB - SPXXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
CBTN - SPXXF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGNN - SPXXF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More