NODB
Price
$55.08
Change
-$0.07 (-0.13%)
Updated
May 27 closing price
Capitalization
98.4M
WCFB
Price
$7.23
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
22.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NODB vs WCFB

Header iconNODB vs WCFB Comparison
Open Charts NODB vs WCFBBanner chart's image
North Dallas Bank & Trust Co. (TX)
Price$55.08
Change-$0.07 (-0.13%)
Volume$200
Capitalization98.4M
WCF Ban
Price$7.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.13K
Capitalization22.41M
NODB vs WCFB Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NODB vs. WCFB commentary
Jun 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NODB is a Hold and WCFB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 02, 2025
Stock price -- (NODB: $55.08 vs. WCFB: $7.23)
Brand notoriety: NODB and WCFB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NODB: 152% vs. WCFB: 185%
Market capitalization -- NODB: $98.4M vs. WCFB: $22.41M
NODB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $98.4M. WCFB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $22.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NODB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWCFB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NODB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WCFB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NODB is a better buy in the long-term than WCFB.

Price Growth

NODB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.13% price change this week, while WCFB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

NODB is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

WCFB is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.35% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NODB($98.4M) has a higher market cap than WCFB($22.4M). NODB YTD gains are higher at: 22.623 vs. WCFB (-3.743). NODB has less debt than WCFB: NODB (5.45M) vs WCFB (14.5M). NODB has higher revenues than WCFB: NODB (28.7M) vs WCFB (3.14M).
NODBWCFBNODB / WCFB
Capitalization98.4M22.4M439%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.623-3.743-604%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue28.7M3.14M913%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt5.45M14.5M38%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NODB vs WCFB: Fundamental Ratings
NODB
WCFB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10050
SMR RATING
1..100
2787
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4750
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1197
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NODB's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as WCFB (86) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that NODB’s stock grew similarly to WCFB’s over the last 12 months.

WCFB's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NODB (100) in the null industry. This means that WCFB’s stock grew somewhat faster than NODB’s over the last 12 months.

NODB's SMR Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WCFB (87) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that NODB’s stock grew somewhat faster than WCFB’s over the last 12 months.

NODB's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as WCFB (50) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that NODB’s stock grew similarly to WCFB’s over the last 12 months.

NODB's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WCFB (97) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that NODB’s stock grew significantly faster than WCFB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBDU23.190.06
+0.26%
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corp ETF
WOMN38.50N/A
N/A
Impact Shares YWCA Women's Empwrmt ETF
BSMT22.58-0.02
-0.11%
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Muncpl Bd ETF
AUSF43.48-0.08
-0.18%
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF
QQQS24.07-0.33
-1.35%
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF

NODB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NODB and CWBK have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NODB and CWBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NODB
1D Price
Change %
NODB100%
N/A
CWBK - NODB
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
SLBK - NODB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPFOF - NODB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCFB - NODB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPXXF - NODB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WCFB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WCFB and ERKH have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WCFB and ERKH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WCFB
1D Price
Change %
WCFB100%
N/A
ERKH - WCFB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSFG - WCFB
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NODB - WCFB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRUX - WCFB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNIB - WCFB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More