It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NOMD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTHS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NOMD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while THS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
NOMD (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.27% price change this week, while THS (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +2.94% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.13%.
NOMD is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.
THS is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
NOMD | THS | NOMD / THS | |
Capitalization | 3.21B | 2.08B | 154% |
EBITDA | 480M | 300M | 160% |
Gain YTD | 13.716 | -10.390 | -132% |
P/E Ratio | 16.07 | 36.86 | 44% |
Revenue | 3.04B | 3.43B | 89% |
Total Cash | 413M | 320M | 129% |
Total Debt | 2.15B | 1.6B | 134% |
NOMD | THS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 74 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 23 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NOMD's Valuation (24) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for THS (86) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NOMD’s stock grew somewhat faster than THS’s over the last 12 months.
NOMD's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as THS (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NOMD’s stock grew similarly to THS’s over the last 12 months.
NOMD's SMR Rating (74) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as THS (85) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NOMD’s stock grew similarly to THS’s over the last 12 months.
NOMD's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as THS (78) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NOMD’s stock grew similarly to THS’s over the last 12 months.
THS's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOMD (50) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that THS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOMD’s over the last 12 months.
NOMD | THS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago45% | 4 days ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago52% | 4 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago57% | 4 days ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago59% | 4 days ago64% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago57% | 4 days ago66% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago56% | 4 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago56% | 14 days ago72% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago46% | 4 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago65% | 4 days ago60% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOMD has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOMD jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NOMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NOMD | 100% | +1.56% | ||
KHC - NOMD | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
SJM - NOMD | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
POST - NOMD | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
FLO - NOMD | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
THS - NOMD | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, THS has been loosely correlated with SJM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if THS jumps, then SJM could also see price increases.