Advertisement
NONOF vs NVO
To understand the difference between Novo Nordisk - Ordinary Shares - Class B (NONOF) vs. Novo Nordisk - ADR (NVO) it is enough to know the definitions of Ordinary Shares - Class B and ADR
Ordinary Shares - Class B - Generally, Class B shares are issued by a company as a common stock with fewer voting rights and lower dividend priority than Class A shares. Class B may also have lower repayment priority in the event of a bankruptcy.
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NONOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNVO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- NONOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NVO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NONOF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NONOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NVO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
NONOF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а -4.59% price change this week, while NVO (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -3.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.72%.
Reported Earning Dates
NVO is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Major (-0.05% weekly)The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
| NONOF | NVO | NONOF / NVO | |
| Capitalization | 216B | 216B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 154B | 154B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | -46.040 | -43.198 | 107% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.78 | 13.11 | 97% |
| Revenue | 312B | 312B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 18.9B | 18.9B | 100% |
| Total Debt | 99.3B | 99.3B | 100% |
NONOF | NVO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 86 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 15 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NONOF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as NVO (11) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that NONOF’s stock grew similarly to NVO’s over the last 12 months.
NVO's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as NONOF (90) in the null industry. This means that NVO’s stock grew similarly to NONOF’s over the last 12 months.
NVO's SMR Rating (15) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as NONOF (15) in the null industry. This means that NVO’s stock grew similarly to NONOF’s over the last 12 months.
NVO's Price Growth Rating (84) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as NONOF (85) in the null industry. This means that NVO’s stock grew similarly to NONOF’s over the last 12 months.
NVO's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as NONOF (96) in the null industry. This means that NVO’s stock grew similarly to NONOF’s over the last 12 months.
| NONOF | NVO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 6 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 76% | 8 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 6 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GGN | 4.87 | 0.04 | +0.83% |
| GAMCO Global Gold Natural Resources & Income Trust | |||
| PCMM | 50.33 | 0.05 | +0.10% |
| BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF | |||
| SRV | 42.91 | -0.17 | -0.39% |
| NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund | |||
| EET | 77.53 | -0.77 | -0.99% |
| ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | |||
| SMH | 333.29 | -7.01 | -2.06% |
| VanEck Semiconductor ETF | |||
NONOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NONOF has been closely correlated with NVO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NONOF jumps, then NVO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NONOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NONOF | 100% | -1.90% | ||
| NVO - NONOF | 70% Closely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| LABFF - NONOF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IMRN - NONOF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QSI - NONOF | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.31% | ||
| VRTX - NONOF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||
NVO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVO has been closely correlated with NONOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NVO jumps, then NONOF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NVO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVO | 100% | -1.88% | ||
| NONOF - NVO | 70% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| TECH - NVO | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| GMAB - NVO | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| MRK - NVO | 35% Loosely correlated | +3.84% | ||
| AMGN - NVO | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
More | ||||