NOPMF
Price
$7.49
Change
+$0.26 (+3.60%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
290.84M
OCLDF
Price
$9.60
Change
+$0.10 (+1.05%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
4.8B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NOPMF vs OCLDF

Header iconNOPMF vs OCLDF Comparison
Open Charts NOPMF vs OCLDFBanner chart's image
Neo Performance Materials
Price$7.49
Change+$0.26 (+3.60%)
Volume$20.72K
Capitalization290.84M
Orica
Price$9.60
Change+$0.10 (+1.05%)
Volume$201
Capitalization4.8B
NOPMF vs OCLDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NOPMF vs. OCLDF commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOPMF is a Hold and OCLDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (NOPMF: $7.49 vs. OCLDF: $9.60)
Brand notoriety: NOPMF and OCLDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NOPMF: 88% vs. OCLDF: 109%
Market capitalization -- NOPMF: $290.84M vs. OCLDF: $4.8B
NOPMF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $290.84M. OCLDF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $4.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NOPMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOCLDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NOPMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OCLDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NOPMF is a better buy in the long-term than OCLDF.

Price Growth

NOPMF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +9.05% price change this week, while OCLDF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.52% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCLDF($4.8B) has a higher market cap than NOPMF($291M). OCLDF has higher P/E ratio than NOPMF: OCLDF (26.32) vs NOPMF (9.78). NOPMF YTD gains are higher at: 35.818 vs. OCLDF (-0.826). OCLDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 900M vs. NOPMF (22.8M). OCLDF has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. NOPMF (146M). NOPMF has less debt than OCLDF: NOPMF (36.8M) vs OCLDF (2.41B). OCLDF has higher revenues than NOPMF: OCLDF (8.09B) vs NOPMF (610M).
NOPMFOCLDFNOPMF / OCLDF
Capitalization291M4.8B6%
EBITDA22.8M900M3%
Gain YTD35.818-0.826-4,334%
P/E Ratio9.7826.3237%
Revenue610M8.09B8%
Total Cash146M1.26B12%
Total Debt36.8M2.41B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOPMF vs OCLDF: Fundamental Ratings
NOPMF
OCLDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
242
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86100
SMR RATING
1..100
9097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4574
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
442
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCLDF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as NOPMF (35). This means that OCLDF’s stock grew similarly to NOPMF’s over the last 12 months.

NOPMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as OCLDF (100). This means that NOPMF’s stock grew similarly to OCLDF’s over the last 12 months.

NOPMF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as OCLDF (97). This means that NOPMF’s stock grew similarly to OCLDF’s over the last 12 months.

NOPMF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as OCLDF (74). This means that NOPMF’s stock grew similarly to OCLDF’s over the last 12 months.

OCLDF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOPMF (44). This means that OCLDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOPMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DESRX22.66N/A
N/A
DWS ESG Core Equity R
EEMAX14.03N/A
N/A
Columbia Emerging Markets A
MMVYX8.85N/A
N/A
MassMutual Small Company Val Svc
HBLSX14.62N/A
N/A
Hartford Balanced Income R4
FMIUX36.84N/A
N/A
FMI Common Stock Institutional

NOPMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NOPMF and LWLG have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NOPMF and LWLG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOPMF
1D Price
Change %
NOPMF100%
+3.62%
LWLG - NOPMF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
IOSP - NOPMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
SXYAY - NOPMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
DOW - NOPMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
ECVT - NOPMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
More

OCLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OCLDF and NVZMY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OCLDF and NVZMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCLDF
1D Price
Change %
OCLDF100%
N/A
NVZMY - OCLDF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
NNUP - OCLDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NOPMF - OCLDF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.62%
NVZMF - OCLDF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
NPCPF - OCLDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More