Ad is loading...
NOSGX vs SSGSX
NOSGX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NOSGX vs SSGSX
Northern Small Cap Value
Price$10.81
Change-$0.24 (-2.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets704.42M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$37.33
Change-$0.88 (-2.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.13B
NOSGX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NOSGX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOSGX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. NOSGX (704M). NOSGX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NOSGX (0.92) vs SSGSX (0.52). NOSGX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NOSGX (31 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NOSGX (0.66). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NOSGX (18.61). NOSGX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -20.58 vs. NOSGX (-43.47). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 12.34 vs. NOSGX (-21.78).
| NOSGX | SSGSX | NOSGX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.26 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.26 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.065 | -17.704 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 704M | 5.13B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.52 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | -43.47 | -20.58 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | -43.21 | -18.79 | 230% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.78 | 12.34 | -177% |
| Returns for 10 years | -44.38 | -2.66 | 1,667% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...