Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NOSGX vs SSGSX
NOSGX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NOSGX vs SSGSX
Northern Small Cap Value
Price$14.03
Change+$0.12 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets666.68M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.89
Change+$0.35 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.44B
NOSGX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NOSGX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOSGX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.44B vs. NOSGX (667M). NOSGX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NOSGX (0.84) vs SSGSX (0.48). NOSGX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NOSGX (32 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NOSGX (0.66). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NOSGX (26.80). NOSGX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.22 vs. NOSGX (-31.98). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 19.51 vs. NOSGX (-14.74).
| NOSGX | SSGSX | NOSGX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.26 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.26 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.918 | 0.237 | 2,920% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 667M | 5.44B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.48 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | -31.98 | -4.22 | 759% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.12 | 6.47 | -296% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.74 | 19.51 | -76% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.70 | 19.36 | -138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement