NPACF
Price
$18.10
Change
+$0.40 (+2.26%)
Updated
Apr 29 closing price
Capitalization
767.63M
STLFF
Price
$0.77
Change
-$0.05 (-6.10%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
957.13M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NPACF vs STLFF

Header iconNPACF vs STLFF Comparison
Open Charts NPACF vs STLFFBanner chart's image
Quadient SA
Price$18.10
Change+$0.40 (+2.26%)
Volume$800
Capitalization767.63M
STILLFRONT GROUP AB
Price$0.77
Change-$0.05 (-6.10%)
Volume$950
Capitalization957.13M
NPACF vs STLFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
STLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NPACF vs. STLFF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPACF is a Hold and STLFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (NPACF: $18.10 vs. STLFF: $0.77)
Brand notoriety: NPACF and STLFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NPACF: 100% vs. STLFF: 160%
Market capitalization -- NPACF: $767.63M vs. STLFF: $957.13M
NPACF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $767.63M. STLFF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $957.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NPACF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTLFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NPACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STLFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NPACF and STLFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

STLFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • STLFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

NPACF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while STLFF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.10%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STLFF($957M) has a higher market cap than NPACF($768M). STLFF has higher P/E ratio than NPACF: STLFF (34.72) vs NPACF (9.60). STLFF YTD gains are higher at: 2.530 vs. NPACF (-3.209). STLFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.59B vs. NPACF (228M). STLFF has more cash in the bank: 874M vs. NPACF (133M). NPACF has less debt than STLFF: NPACF (910M) vs STLFF (5.09B). STLFF has higher revenues than NPACF: STLFF (7.14B) vs NPACF (1.04B).
NPACFSTLFFNPACF / STLFF
Capitalization768M957M80%
EBITDA228M2.59B9%
Gain YTD-3.2092.530-127%
P/E Ratio9.6034.7228%
Revenue1.04B7.14B15%
Total Cash133M874M15%
Total Debt910M5.09B18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NPACF: Fundamental Ratings
NPACF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
82
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NPACFSTLFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
STLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIOTX24.21N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Core Equity A
FBDIX115.25N/A
N/A
Franklin Biotechnology Discovery A
WBCCX10.58N/A
N/A
TETON Westwood Balanced C
OWSMX17.70N/A
N/A
Old Westbury Small & Mid Cap Strategies
JIHCX18.05N/A
N/A
JPMorgan International Hedged Equity C

NPACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPACF has been loosely correlated with LKRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPACF jumps, then LKRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPACF
1D Price
Change %
NPACF100%
N/A
LKRY - NPACF
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NRDY - NPACF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PUBM - NPACF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
MITK - NPACF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
PET - NPACF
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.39%
More

STLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STLFF and NPACF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STLFF and NPACF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STLFF
1D Price
Change %
STLFF100%
N/A
NPACF - STLFF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SYZLF - STLFF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
TAPM - STLFF
8%
Poorly correlated
+7.85%
SPMYY - STLFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SQNNY - STLFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More