Ad is loading...
NPACF
Price
$18.70
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 9 closing price
WPNDF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

NPACF vs WPNDF

Header iconNPACF vs WPNDF Comparison
Open Charts NPACF vs WPNDFBanner chart's image
Quadient SA
Price$18.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
Wishpond Technologies
Price$0.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.02K
CapitalizationN/A
NPACF vs WPNDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NPACF vs. WPNDF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPACF is a Hold and WPNDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (NPACF: $18.70 vs. WPNDF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: NPACF and WPNDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NPACF: 100% vs. WPNDF: 188%
Market capitalization -- NPACF: $767.63M vs. WPNDF: $29.21M
NPACF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $767.63M. WPNDF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $29.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NPACF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWPNDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NPACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WPNDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WPNDF is a better buy in the long-term than NPACF.

Price Growth

NPACF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WPNDF (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPACF($768M) has a higher market cap than WPNDF($29.2M). NPACF YTD gains are higher at: -10.952 vs. WPNDF (-25.132). NPACF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 228M vs. WPNDF (-478.4K). NPACF has more cash in the bank: 133M vs. WPNDF (1.93M). WPNDF has less debt than NPACF: WPNDF (0) vs NPACF (910M). NPACF has higher revenues than WPNDF: NPACF (1.04B) vs WPNDF (22M).
NPACFWPNDFNPACF / WPNDF
Capitalization768M29.2M2,630%
EBITDA228M-478.4K-47,659%
Gain YTD-10.952-25.13244%
P/E Ratio9.60N/A-
Revenue1.04B22M4,745%
Total Cash133M1.93M6,877%
Total Debt910M0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NPACF: Fundamental Ratings
NPACF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
80
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZDIIX27.06-0.08
-0.29%
Zacks Dividend Institutional
GTCSX35.13-0.48
-1.35%
Glenmede Small Cap Equity Adv
SLPSX93.68-1.34
-1.41%
ProFunds Small Cap Svc
FICIX13.46-0.25
-1.82%
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl R6
JACNX31.35-0.64
-2.00%
Janus Henderson Contrarian D

NPACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPACF has been loosely correlated with LKRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPACF jumps, then LKRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPACF
1D Price
Change %
NPACF100%
N/A
LKRY - NPACF
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VCSA - NPACF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
NRDY - NPACF
35%
Loosely correlated
+13.73%
PUBM - NPACF
31%
Poorly correlated
-4.80%
MITK - NPACF
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.79%
More

WPNDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WPNDF and RADLF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WPNDF and RADLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WPNDF
1D Price
Change %
WPNDF100%
N/A
RADLF - WPNDF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPACF - WPNDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTOW - WPNDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PET - WPNDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.85%
DAVA - WPNDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.88%
More