NPCPF
Price
$6.30
Change
-$0.56 (-8.16%)
Updated
Oct 20 closing price
Capitalization
14.45B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OCLDF
Price
$14.92
Change
+$1.05 (+7.57%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
7.19B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NPCPF vs OCLDF

Header iconNPCPF vs OCLDF Comparison
Open Charts NPCPF vs OCLDFBanner chart's image
Nippon Paint Holdings
Price$6.30
Change-$0.56 (-8.16%)
Volume$100
Capitalization14.45B
Orica
Price$14.92
Change+$1.05 (+7.57%)
Volume$372
Capitalization7.19B
NPCPF vs OCLDF Comparison Chart in %
NPCPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OCLDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NPCPF vs. OCLDF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPCPF is a Hold and OCLDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (NPCPF: $6.30 vs. OCLDF: $14.92)
Brand notoriety: NPCPF and OCLDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NPCPF: 7% vs. OCLDF: 171%
Market capitalization -- NPCPF: $14.45B vs. OCLDF: $7.19B
NPCPF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $14.45B. OCLDF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $7.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $192.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NPCPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOCLDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NPCPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OCLDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCLDF is a better buy in the long-term than NPCPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NPCPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OCLDF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NPCPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • OCLDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NPCPF and OCLDF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NPCPF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OCLDF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +7.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -3.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-3.49% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPCPF($14.5B) has a higher market cap than OCLDF($7.19B). OCLDF has higher P/E ratio than NPCPF: OCLDF (69.22) vs NPCPF (15.35). OCLDF YTD gains are higher at: 54.132 vs. NPCPF (0.429). NPCPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 297B vs. OCLDF (1.04B). NPCPF has more cash in the bank: 455B vs. OCLDF (581M). OCLDF has less debt than NPCPF: OCLDF (2.52B) vs NPCPF (1.42T). NPCPF has higher revenues than OCLDF: NPCPF (1.67T) vs OCLDF (7.97B).
NPCPFOCLDFNPCPF / OCLDF
Capitalization14.5B7.19B202%
EBITDA297B1.04B28,585%
Gain YTD0.42954.1321%
P/E Ratio15.3569.2222%
Revenue1.67T7.97B20,993%
Total Cash455B581M78,313%
Total Debt1.42T2.52B56,486%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NPCPF vs OCLDF: Fundamental Ratings
NPCPF
OCLDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3245
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10041
SMR RATING
1..100
10093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6440
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
643
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCLDF's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as NPCPF (52). This means that OCLDF’s stock grew similarly to NPCPF’s over the last 12 months.

OCLDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NPCPF (100). This means that OCLDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NPCPF’s over the last 12 months.

OCLDF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as NPCPF (100). This means that OCLDF’s stock grew similarly to NPCPF’s over the last 12 months.

OCLDF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as NPCPF (64). This means that OCLDF’s stock grew similarly to NPCPF’s over the last 12 months.

OCLDF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NPCPF (64). This means that OCLDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NPCPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NPCPFOCLDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NPCPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OCLDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NDIA30.250.14
+0.48%
Global X India Active ETF
DMX50.350.02
+0.05%
DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF
MUC10.69N/A
N/A
Blackrock Muniholdings California Quality Fund
MMSD25.40-0.01
-0.05%
Nyli Mackay Muni Short Duration ETF
RTH243.98-0.77
-0.32%
VanEck Retail ETF

NPCPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPCPF has been loosely correlated with TYOBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPCPF jumps, then TYOBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPCPF
1D Price
Change %
NPCPF100%
N/A
TYOBY - NPCPF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TOSCF - NPCPF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTIC - NPCPF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
NVZMF - NPCPF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
NNXPF - NPCPF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
More

OCLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OCLDF and NVZMY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OCLDF and NVZMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCLDF
1D Price
Change %
OCLDF100%
N/A
NVZMY - OCLDF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
NNUP - OCLDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NOPMF - OCLDF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
NVZMF - OCLDF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
NPCPF - OCLDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More