NPCPF
Price
$7.63
Change
+$1.36 (+21.69%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
21.72B
OCLDF
Price
$9.60
Change
+$0.10 (+1.05%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
4.8B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NPCPF vs OCLDF

Header iconNPCPF vs OCLDF Comparison
Open Charts NPCPF vs OCLDFBanner chart's image
Nippon Paint Holdings
Price$7.63
Change+$1.36 (+21.69%)
Volume$495
Capitalization21.72B
Orica
Price$9.60
Change+$0.10 (+1.05%)
Volume$201
Capitalization4.8B
NPCPF vs OCLDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NPCPF vs. OCLDF commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPCPF is a Hold and OCLDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (NPCPF: $7.63 vs. OCLDF: $9.60)
Brand notoriety: NPCPF and OCLDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NPCPF: 216% vs. OCLDF: 109%
Market capitalization -- NPCPF: $21.72B vs. OCLDF: $4.8B
NPCPF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $21.72B. OCLDF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $4.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NPCPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOCLDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NPCPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OCLDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCLDF is a better buy in the long-term than NPCPF.

Price Growth

NPCPF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OCLDF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.52% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPCPF($21.7B) has a higher market cap than OCLDF($4.8B). NPCPF has higher P/E ratio than OCLDF: NPCPF (31.35) vs OCLDF (26.32). NPCPF YTD gains are higher at: 21.630 vs. OCLDF (-0.826). NPCPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 177B vs. OCLDF (900M). NPCPF has more cash in the bank: 236B vs. OCLDF (1.26B). OCLDF has less debt than NPCPF: OCLDF (2.41B) vs NPCPF (722B). NPCPF has higher revenues than OCLDF: NPCPF (1.35T) vs OCLDF (8.09B).
NPCPFOCLDFNPCPF / OCLDF
Capitalization21.7B4.8B452%
EBITDA177B900M19,667%
Gain YTD21.630-0.826-2,617%
P/E Ratio31.3526.32119%
Revenue1.35T8.09B16,741%
Total Cash236B1.26B18,805%
Total Debt722B2.41B29,996%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NPCPF vs OCLDF: Fundamental Ratings
NPCPF
OCLDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4542
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4174
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
652
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCLDF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as NPCPF (59). This means that OCLDF’s stock grew similarly to NPCPF’s over the last 12 months.

OCLDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NPCPF (100). This means that OCLDF’s stock grew similarly to NPCPF’s over the last 12 months.

NPCPF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OCLDF (97). This means that NPCPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OCLDF’s over the last 12 months.

NPCPF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OCLDF (74). This means that NPCPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OCLDF’s over the last 12 months.

OCLDF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NPCPF (65). This means that OCLDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NPCPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGIDX35.39N/A
N/A
Steward Global Equity Income Fund A
RICBX60.21N/A
N/A
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer R2
NSIDX13.17N/A
N/A
Northern Small Cap Index
DEVCX45.86N/A
N/A
Macquarie Small Cap Value C
FLEKX12.07N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Equ Premium Income R6

NPCPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPCPF has been loosely correlated with TYOBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPCPF jumps, then TYOBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPCPF
1D Price
Change %
NPCPF100%
N/A
TYOBY - NPCPF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TOSCF - NPCPF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTIC - NPCPF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
NVZMF - NPCPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
NNXPF - NPCPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
More

OCLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OCLDF and NVZMY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OCLDF and NVZMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCLDF
1D Price
Change %
OCLDF100%
N/A
NVZMY - OCLDF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
NNUP - OCLDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NOPMF - OCLDF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.62%
NVZMF - OCLDF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
NPCPF - OCLDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More