It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NPNYY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOROVF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NPNYY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OROVF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
NPNYY (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -0.46% price change this week, while OROVF (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -3.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.60%.
The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
NPNYY | OROVF | NPNYY / OROVF | |
Capitalization | 14.4B | 8.82B | 163% |
EBITDA | 608B | 2.26B | 26,938% |
Gain YTD | 5.133 | -14.454 | -36% |
P/E Ratio | 5.99 | 7.69 | 78% |
Revenue | 2.54T | 8.34B | 30,393% |
Total Cash | 145B | 727M | 19,945% |
Total Debt | 729B | 1.44B | 50,695% |
NPNYY | OROVF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 94 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OROVF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as NPNYY (24). This means that OROVF’s stock grew similarly to NPNYY’s over the last 12 months.
NPNYY's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as OROVF (20). This means that NPNYY’s stock grew similarly to OROVF’s over the last 12 months.
OROVF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NPNYY (100). This means that OROVF’s stock grew significantly faster than NPNYY’s over the last 12 months.
NPNYY's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as OROVF (62). This means that NPNYY’s stock grew similarly to OROVF’s over the last 12 months.
OROVF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NPNYY (85). This means that OROVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NPNYY’s over the last 12 months.
NPNYY | OROVF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago50% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago62% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago49% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago45% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago51% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago35% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago67% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPNYY has been closely correlated with MSLOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NPNYY jumps, then MSLOY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NPNYY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NPNYY | 100% | +0.62% | ||
MSLOY - NPNYY | 80% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
AMKBY - NPNYY | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
GASS - NPNYY | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
ZIM - NPNYY | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
MPZZF - NPNYY | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that OROVF and HHULY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OROVF and HHULY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OROVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OROVF | 100% | N/A | ||
HHULY - OROVF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HSHP - OROVF | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.70% | ||
NPNYY - OROVF | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.62% | ||
NYUKF - OROVF | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MSLOY - OROVF | 14% Poorly correlated | -1.30% | ||
More |