NPPXF
Price
$1.05
Change
+$0.04 (+3.96%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
88.77B
QBCAF
Price
$27.15
Change
-$1.89 (-6.51%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
7.23B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NPPXF vs QBCAF

Header iconNPPXF vs QBCAF Comparison
Open Charts NPPXF vs QBCAFBanner chart's image
NTT
Price$1.05
Change+$0.04 (+3.96%)
Volume$6.63K
Capitalization88.77B
Quebecor
Price$27.15
Change-$1.89 (-6.51%)
Volume$100
Capitalization7.23B
NPPXF vs QBCAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NPPXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QBCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NPPXF vs. QBCAF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPPXF is a Hold and QBCAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (NPPXF: $1.05 vs. QBCAF: $27.15)
Brand notoriety: NPPXF and QBCAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NPPXF: 52% vs. QBCAF: 100%
Market capitalization -- NPPXF: $88.77B vs. QBCAF: $7.23B
NPPXF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $88.77B. QBCAF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $7.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $284.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NPPXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQBCAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NPPXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QBCAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QBCAF is a better buy in the long-term than NPPXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NPPXF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBCAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NPPXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • QBCAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NPPXF is a better buy in the short-term than QBCAF.

Price Growth

NPPXF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -8.70% price change this week, while QBCAF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (-0.28% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPPXF($88.8B) has a higher market cap than QBCAF($7.23B). NPPXF has higher P/E ratio than QBCAF: NPPXF (12.99) vs QBCAF (11.21). QBCAF YTD gains are higher at: 9.914 vs. NPPXF (6.061). NPPXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.67T vs. QBCAF (2.3B). NPPXF has more cash in the bank: 2.15T vs. QBCAF (21M). QBCAF has less debt than NPPXF: QBCAF (7.48B) vs NPPXF (10.93T). NPPXF has higher revenues than QBCAF: NPPXF (13.6T) vs QBCAF (5.61B).
NPPXFQBCAFNPPXF / QBCAF
Capitalization88.8B7.23B1,228%
EBITDA3.67T2.3B159,478%
Gain YTD6.0619.91461%
P/E Ratio12.9911.21116%
Revenue13.6T5.61B242,356%
Total Cash2.15T21M10,219,048%
Total Debt10.93T7.48B146,083%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NPPXF vs QBCAF: Fundamental Ratings
NPPXF
QBCAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8362
SMR RATING
1..100
10027
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4241
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7530

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NPPXF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as QBCAF (62). This means that NPPXF’s stock grew similarly to QBCAF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as NPPXF (83). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew similarly to NPPXF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's SMR Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NPPXF (100). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew significantly faster than NPPXF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as NPPXF (60). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew similarly to NPPXF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as NPPXF (42). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew similarly to NPPXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NPPXFQBCAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NPPXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QBCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZJYL0.620.02
+3.32%
JIN MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL Ltd
BCH30.420.66
+2.22%
Banco de ChileAmerican
YCBD0.730.01
+1.44%
CBDMD Inc
BHB32.08-0.36
-1.11%
Bar Harbor Bankshares
TRMK40.25-0.53
-1.30%
Trustmark Corp

NPPXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NPPXF and PCWLF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NPPXF and PCWLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPPXF
1D Price
Change %
NPPXF100%
+3.45%
PCWLF - NPPXF
12%
Poorly correlated
+3.85%
KKPNY - NPPXF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
KTEL - NPPXF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
KNIT - NPPXF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NZTCF - NPPXF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QBCAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QBCAF and SFBQF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QBCAF and SFBQF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBCAF
1D Price
Change %
QBCAF100%
N/A
SFBQF - QBCAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.70%
PCWLF - QBCAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.85%
SFTBY - QBCAF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
NPPXF - QBCAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.45%
SGAPY - QBCAF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
More