NPPXF
Price
$0.97
Change
-$0.21 (-17.80%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
91.65B
QBCAF
Price
$27.15
Change
-$1.89 (-6.51%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
6.75B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NPPXF vs QBCAF

Header iconNPPXF vs QBCAF Comparison
Open Charts NPPXF vs QBCAFBanner chart's image
NTT
Price$0.97
Change-$0.21 (-17.80%)
Volume$289
Capitalization91.65B
Quebecor
Price$27.15
Change-$1.89 (-6.51%)
Volume$100
Capitalization6.75B
NPPXF vs QBCAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NPPXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QBCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NPPXF vs. QBCAF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPPXF is a Hold and QBCAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (NPPXF: $0.97 vs. QBCAF: $27.15)
Brand notoriety: NPPXF and QBCAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NPPXF: 2% vs. QBCAF: 92%
Market capitalization -- NPPXF: $91.65B vs. QBCAF: $6.75B
NPPXF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $91.65B. QBCAF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $6.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $286.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NPPXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQBCAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NPPXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QBCAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QBCAF is a better buy in the long-term than NPPXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NPPXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBCAF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NPPXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • QBCAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QBCAF is a better buy in the short-term than NPPXF.

Price Growth

NPPXF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -1.02% price change this week, while QBCAF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.92% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPPXF($91.7B) has a higher market cap than QBCAF($6.75B). NPPXF has higher P/E ratio than QBCAF: NPPXF (11.93) vs QBCAF (11.18). QBCAF YTD gains are higher at: 9.914 vs. NPPXF (-2.020). NPPXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.67T vs. QBCAF (2.33B). NPPXF has more cash in the bank: 2.15T vs. QBCAF (214M). QBCAF has less debt than NPPXF: QBCAF (7.97B) vs NPPXF (10.93T). NPPXF has higher revenues than QBCAF: NPPXF (13.6T) vs QBCAF (5.62B).
NPPXFQBCAFNPPXF / QBCAF
Capitalization91.7B6.75B1,358%
EBITDA3.67T2.33B157,763%
Gain YTD-2.0209.914-20%
P/E Ratio11.9311.18107%
Revenue13.6T5.62B242,054%
Total Cash2.15T214M1,002,804%
Total Debt10.93T7.97B137,050%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NPPXF vs QBCAF: Fundamental Ratings
NPPXF
QBCAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9664
SMR RATING
1..100
10025
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6353
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2641
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QBCAF's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as NPPXF (44). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew similarly to NPPXF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as NPPXF (96). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew similarly to NPPXF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's SMR Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NPPXF (100). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew significantly faster than NPPXF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as NPPXF (63). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew similarly to NPPXF’s over the last 12 months.

NPPXF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as QBCAF (41). This means that NPPXF’s stock grew similarly to QBCAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NPPXFQBCAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
8%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NPPXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QBCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MXE10.940.09
+0.88%
Mexico Equity and Income Fund (The)
CRBN219.550.17
+0.08%
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF
CPSY24.42N/A
-0.02%
Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Jan
IMTB43.53-0.02
-0.05%
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
USIN50.17-0.07
-0.14%
WisdomTree 7-10 Year Laddered Trsy ETF

NPPXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NPPXF and PCWLF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NPPXF and PCWLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPPXF
1D Price
Change %
NPPXF100%
N/A
PCWLF - NPPXF
12%
Poorly correlated
-7.90%
KKPNY - NPPXF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
KTEL - NPPXF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
KNIT - NPPXF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NZTCF - NPPXF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QBCAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QBCAF and SFBQF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QBCAF and SFBQF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBCAF
1D Price
Change %
QBCAF100%
N/A
SFBQF - QBCAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PCWLF - QBCAF
4%
Poorly correlated
-7.90%
SFTBY - QBCAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+6.46%
NPPXF - QBCAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGAPY - QBCAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
More