NPWR
Price
$2.20
Change
-$0.03 (-1.35%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
171.34M
71 days until earnings call
PORT
Price
$44.01
Change
-$3.99 (-8.31%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
254.73M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NPWR vs PORT

Header iconNPWR vs PORT Comparison
Open Charts NPWR vs PORTBanner chart's image
NET Power
Price$2.20
Change-$0.03 (-1.35%)
Volume$612.39K
Capitalization171.34M
Southport Acquisition
Price$44.01
Change-$3.99 (-8.31%)
Volume$1.13K
Capitalization254.73M
NPWR vs PORT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NPWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PORT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NPWR vs. PORT commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPWR is a Buy and PORT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (NPWR: $2.20 vs. PORT: $44.01)
Brand notoriety: NPWR and PORT are both not notable
NPWR represents the Industrial Machinery, while PORT is part of the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NPWR: 40% vs. PORT: 43%
Market capitalization -- NPWR: $171.34M vs. PORT: $254.73M
NPWR [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $171.34M. PORT’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $254.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $206.32B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $13.68B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.14M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NPWR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePORT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NPWR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PORT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PORT is a better buy in the long-term than NPWR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NPWR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PORT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NPWR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PORT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PORT is a better buy in the short-term than NPWR.

Price Growth

NPWR (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -13.73% price change this week, while PORT (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -3.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.25%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

NPWR is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-0.43% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.12% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PORT($255M) has a higher market cap than NPWR($171M). PORT YTD gains are higher at: 295.063 vs. NPWR (-79.226). PORT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.4M vs. NPWR (-117.91M). NPWR has more cash in the bank: 491M vs. PORT (329K). PORT has less debt than NPWR: PORT (814K) vs NPWR (2.76M). NPWR has higher revenues than PORT: NPWR (250K) vs PORT (0).
NPWRPORTNPWR / PORT
Capitalization171M255M67%
EBITDA-117.91M-4.4M2,677%
Gain YTD-79.226295.063-27%
P/E RatioN/A110.45-
Revenue250K0-
Total Cash491M329K149,240%
Total Debt2.76M814K339%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NPWRPORT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
5%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
N/A
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
26%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NPWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PORT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGDIX96.982.61
+2.77%
Sprott Gold Equity Institutional
TISDX11.960.09
+0.76%
Transamerica Intl Sust Eq A
FIKVX14.200.04
+0.25%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Z
RCOCX46.16-0.01
-0.02%
Victory RS Large Cap Alpha C
CBECX11.01-0.01
-0.09%
Allspring Large Cap Value CL C

PORT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PORT and CSTUF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PORT and CSTUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PORT
1D Price
Change %
PORT100%
-8.31%
CSTUF - PORT
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VMCAF - PORT
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSTAF - PORT
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QETAU - PORT
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPWR - PORT
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
More