Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCFX vs RGACX
NQCFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NQCFX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$80.74
Change+$0.44 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.95B
NQCFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCFX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCFX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. NQCFX (8.93M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NQCFX: RGACX (0.07) vs NQCFX (0.00). NQCFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NQCFX (24 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NQCFX (1.42) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NQCFX (11.05). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCFX: RGACX (250) vs NQCFX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.15 vs. NQCFX (2.30). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 44.17 vs. NQCFX (36.44).
| NQCFX | RGACX | NQCFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.94 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.94 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.352 | 12.154 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.93M | 324B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.30 | 12.15 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.90 | 58.65 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.44 | 44.17 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.65 | 79.16 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement