Ad is loading...
NQCFX vs RGACX
NQCFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NQCFX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$66.49
Change+$6.32 (+10.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.76B
NQCFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCFX vs. RGACX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 246B vs. NQCFX (7.4M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NQCFX: RGACX (0.09) vs NQCFX (0.00). NQCFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NQCFX (23 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NQCFX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NQCFX (2.47). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCFX: RGACX (250) vs NQCFX (1000). NQCFX (-12.26) and RGACX (-12.54) have marching annual gain over last year. NQCFX (35.91) and RGACX (34.35) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NQCFX | RGACX | NQCFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.94 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.94 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.768 | -16.419 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.4M | 246B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.26 | -12.54 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.47 | -4.11 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.91 | 34.35 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.25 | 36.41 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...