Ad is loading...
NQGAX vs TEDSX
NQGAX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts NQGAX vs TEDSX
Nuveen Global Equity Income A
Price$36.39
Change+$0.13 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.16M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$30.50
Change+$0.13 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.12B
NQGAX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQGAX vs. TEDSX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQGAX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.12B vs. NQGAX (134M). NQGAX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: NQGAX (2.08) vs TEDSX (0.92). NQGAX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: NQGAX (16 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than NQGAX (1.27). TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.47 vs. NQGAX (27.00). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQGAX: TEDSX (1000) vs NQGAX (2500). NQGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.52 vs. TEDSX (-1.97). NQGAX return over 5 years is better than : 115.05 vs. TEDSX (52.35).
| NQGAX | TEDSX | NQGAX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.96 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.96 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.117 | 8.194 | 62% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134M | 9.12B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.08 | 0.92 | 226% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.52 | -1.97 | -636% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.25 | 0.24 | 10,072% |
| Returns for 5 years | 115.05 | 52.35 | 220% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.08 | -6.36 | -991% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers