Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQGAX vs TEDSX
NQGAX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts NQGAX vs TEDSX
Nuveen Global Equity Income A
Price$40.75
Change-$0.05 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.32M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.62
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.41B
NQGAX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQGAX vs. TEDSX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQGAX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.41B vs. NQGAX (146M). NQGAX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: NQGAX (1.85) vs TEDSX (0.90). NQGAX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: NQGAX (16 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than NQGAX (1.27). TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. NQGAX (27.00). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQGAX: TEDSX (1000) vs NQGAX (2500). NQGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.27 vs. TEDSX (1.69). NQGAX return over 5 years is better than : 88.50 vs. TEDSX (33.11).
| NQGAX | TEDSX | NQGAX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.96 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.96 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.252 | 16.245 | 119% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 146M | 9.41B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 0.90 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.27 | 1.69 | 1,143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.23 | 18.67 | 328% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.50 | 33.11 | 267% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.85 | 10.16 | 982% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement