Ad is loading...
NRACX vs VITSX
NRACX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts NRACX vs VITSX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity C
Price$44.02
Change+$0.78 (+1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$127.51
Change+$2.22 (+1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7T
NRACX vs VITSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRACX vs. VITSX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRACX is a Buy and VITSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 1.7T vs. NRACX (1.55B). VITSX pays higher dividends than NRACX: VITSX (1.36) vs NRACX (0.00). NRACX was incepted earlier than VITSX: NRACX (16 years) vs VITSX (28 years). NRACX (1.82) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). NRACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 8.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). NRACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: NRACX (1000) vs VITSX (5000000). VITSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.31 vs. NRACX (-0.25). VITSX return over 5 years is better than : 85.37 vs. NRACX (36.27).
| NRACX | VITSX | NRACX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.03 | 6,067% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.03 | 6,067% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.190 | -11.145 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 1.7T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.36 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.25 | 0.31 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.96 | 17.03 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.27 | 85.37 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.59 | 145.77 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...