NRDBY
Price
$14.57
Change
+$0.01 (+0.07%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
40.35B
TFC
Price
$42.53
Change
+$1.13 (+2.73%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
52.02B
22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NRDBY vs TFC

Header iconNRDBY vs TFC Comparison
Open Charts NRDBY vs TFCBanner chart's image
Nordea Bank Abp
Price$14.57
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
Volume$178.64K
Capitalization40.35B
Truist Financial
Price$42.53
Change+$1.13 (+2.73%)
Volume$50.98K
Capitalization52.02B
NRDBY vs TFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NRDBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NRDBY vs. TFC commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRDBY is a StrongBuy and TFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (NRDBY: $14.57 vs. TFC: $41.40)
Brand notoriety: NRDBY and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NRDBY: 70% vs. TFC: 83%
Market capitalization -- NRDBY: $40.35B vs. TFC: $52.02B
NRDBY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $40.35B. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $52.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NRDBY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NRDBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NRDBY is a better buy in the long-term than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NRDBY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NRDBY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NRDBY is a better buy in the short-term than TFC.

Price Growth

NRDBY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.77% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

NRDBY is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2025.

TFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.99% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFC($52B) has a higher market cap than NRDBY($40.4B). NRDBY (7.95) and TFC (7.93) have similar P/E ratio . NRDBY YTD gains are higher at: 44.278 vs. TFC (-2.199). TFC has less debt than NRDBY: TFC (59.7B) vs NRDBY (196B). TFC has higher revenues than NRDBY: TFC (23.4B) vs NRDBY (11.3B).
NRDBYTFCNRDBY / TFC
Capitalization40.4B52B78%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD44.278-2.199-2,014%
P/E Ratio7.957.93100%
Revenue11.3B23.4B48%
Total CashN/A5.07B-
Total Debt196B59.7B328%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NRDBY vs TFC: Fundamental Ratings
NRDBY
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
738
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
669
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4351
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3580
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TFC's Valuation (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NRDBY (85). This means that TFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NRDBY’s over the last 12 months.

NRDBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (69). This means that NRDBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as NRDBY (5). This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to NRDBY’s over the last 12 months.

NRDBY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as TFC (51). This means that NRDBY’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

NRDBY's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (80). This means that NRDBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NRDBYTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NRDBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KVUE21.17-0.02
-0.09%
Kenvue
MSGS205.73-1.87
-0.90%
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp
TRS27.60-0.28
-1.00%
TriMas Corp
RLGT6.00-0.08
-1.32%
Radiant Logistics
FBLG0.72-0.03
-3.43%
FibroBiologics

NRDBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NRDBY has been loosely correlated with SWDBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NRDBY jumps, then SWDBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRDBY
1D Price
Change %
NRDBY100%
+0.09%
SWDBY - NRDBY
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
BNPQY - NRDBY
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
DNBBY - NRDBY
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
ISNPY - NRDBY
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
TFC - NRDBY
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
More