Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs PCSMX
NRGSX vs PCSMX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs PCSMX
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$62.79
Change-$0.75 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.85B
Principal SmallCap Growth I R6
Price$16.42
Change-$0.12 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.19B
NRGSX vs PCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. PCSMX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Hold and PCSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.85B vs. PCSMX (2.19B). PCSMX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: PCSMX (0.56) vs NRGSX (0.06). NRGSX was incepted earlier than PCSMX: NRGSX (13 years) vs PCSMX (11 years). PCSMX (0.90) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). PCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.20 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX (0) and PCSMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. NRGSX (-7.08). PCSMX return over 5 years is better than : 0.84 vs. NRGSX (-0.74).
| NRGSX | PCSMX | NRGSX / PCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.87 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.90 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.770 | 11.007 | -25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.85B | 2.19B | 405% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.56 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.08 | 4.25 | -167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.58 | 41.56 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.74 | 0.84 | -89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.64 | 39.55 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement