Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs QSMRX
NRGSX vs QSMRX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs QSMRX
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.19B
AQR Small Cap Momentum Style R6
Price$21.41
Change+$0.05 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.06M
NRGSX vs QSMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. QSMRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Hold and QSMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. QSMRX (138M). QSMRX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: QSMRX (0.33) vs NRGSX (0.07). NRGSX was incepted earlier than QSMRX: NRGSX (13 years) vs QSMRX (11 years). NRGSX (0.74) is less costly to investors than QSMRX (0.65). QSMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than QSMRX: NRGSX (0) vs QSMRX (50000000). QSMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.83 vs. NRGSX (-14.62). QSMRX return over 5 years is better than : -0.03 vs. NRGSX (-11.01).
| NRGSX | QSMRX | NRGSX / QSMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.53 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.65 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.590 | 11.918 | -64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 50000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.19B | 138M | 5,935% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.33 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.62 | -10.83 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.10 | 22.59 | -18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.01 | -0.03 | 37,438% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.70 | 11.85 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement