Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs SBHCX
NRGSX vs SBHCX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs SBHCX
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.19B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Cre Ret
Price$12.55
Change+$0.06 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.13M
NRGSX vs SBHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. SBHCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Hold and SBHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. SBHCX (94.1M). SBHCX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: SBHCX (0.20) vs NRGSX (0.07). NRGSX was incepted earlier than SBHCX: NRGSX (13 years) vs SBHCX (6 years). SBHCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). SBHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHCX: NRGSX (0) vs SBHCX (2500). SBHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.30 vs. NRGSX (-14.62). SBHCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.64 vs. NRGSX (-11.01).
| NRGSX | SBHCX | NRGSX / SBHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.14 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.46 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.590 | -0.399 | 1,904% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.19B | 94.1M | 8,704% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.20 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.62 | -8.30 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.10 | 12.13 | -34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.01 | 11.64 | -95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement