Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs TQAAX
NRGSX vs TQAAX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs TQAAX
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.39
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.2B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US Sm Gr Eq Adv
Price$44.18
Change+$0.05 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.03B
NRGSX vs TQAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. TQAAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Hold and TQAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX (8.2B) and TQAAX (8.04B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . NRGSX pays higher dividends than TQAAX: NRGSX (0.07) vs TQAAX (0.00). NRGSX was incepted earlier than TQAAX: NRGSX (13 years) vs TQAAX (9 years). TQAAX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). TQAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.70 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQAAX: NRGSX (0) vs TQAAX (2500). TQAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.44 vs. NRGSX (-14.54). TQAAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.84 vs. NRGSX (-10.73).
| NRGSX | TQAAX | NRGSX / TQAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.07 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.07 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.544 | 4.593 | -164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.2B | 8.04B | 102% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.54 | -6.44 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.05 | 21.04 | -19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.73 | -1.84 | 582% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement