Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs TSCPX
NRGSX vs TSCPX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs TSCPX
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.19B
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
Price$12.22
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.76M
NRGSX vs TSCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. TSCPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Hold and TSCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. TSCPX (109M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than TSCPX: NRGSX (0.07) vs TSCPX (0.00). NRGSX was incepted earlier than TSCPX: NRGSX (13 years) vs TSCPX (26 years). TSCPX (1.22) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). TSCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSCPX: NRGSX (0) vs TSCPX (2000). TSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.02 vs. NRGSX (-14.62). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -11.01 vs. TSCPX (-26.76).
| NRGSX | TSCPX | NRGSX / TSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.17 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.22 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.590 | 0.911 | -833% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.19B | 109M | 7,514% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.62 | -7.02 | 208% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.10 | 12.88 | -32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.01 | -26.76 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.70 | -28.05 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement