Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs TSCPX
NRGSX vs TSCPX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs TSCPX
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$63.09
Change-$0.69 (-1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.89B
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
Price$12.30
Change-$0.17 (-1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets114M
NRGSX vs TSCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. TSCPX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Hold and TSCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.9B vs. TSCPX (114M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than TSCPX: NRGSX (0.06) vs TSCPX (0.00). NRGSX was incepted earlier than TSCPX: NRGSX (13 years) vs TSCPX (26 years). TSCPX (1.22) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). TSCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSCPX: NRGSX (0) vs TSCPX (2000). TSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.38 vs. NRGSX (-5.89). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : 0.66 vs. TSCPX (-19.91).
| NRGSX | TSCPX | NRGSX / TSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.17 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.22 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.402 | 3.314 | -72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.9B | 114M | 7,803% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.89 | 1.38 | -426% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.52 | 23.34 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.66 | -19.91 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.35 | -25.41 | -45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers