Ad is loading...
NRGSX vs WCMLX
NRGSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$57.97
Change-$0.19 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.74B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.25
Change-$0.03 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.18M
NRGSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.74B vs. WCMLX (40.2M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: NRGSX (0.07) vs WCMLX (0.00). NRGSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NRGSX (12 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NRGSX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). NRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.21 vs. WCMLX (-8.09). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 28.13 vs. NRGSX (18.92).
| NRGSX | WCMLX | NRGSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.99 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.86 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.293 | -12.519 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.74B | 40.2M | 21,741% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.21 | -8.09 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.38 | 0.72 | -611% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.92 | 28.13 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.95 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers