Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs WEMCX
NRGSX vs WEMCX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs WEMCX
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.19B
Allspring Emerging Growth C
Price$5.99
Change+$0.04 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets314.9M
NRGSX vs WEMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. WEMCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Hold and WEMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. WEMCX (315M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than WEMCX: NRGSX (0.07) vs WEMCX (0.00). NRGSX was incepted earlier than WEMCX: NRGSX (13 years) vs WEMCX (18 years). WEMCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). WEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEMCX: NRGSX (0) vs WEMCX (1000). NRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.62 vs. WEMCX (-22.31). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -11.01 vs. WEMCX (-64.24).
| NRGSX | WEMCX | NRGSX / WEMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.97 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.15 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.590 | -9.242 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.19B | 315M | 2,600% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.62 | -22.31 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.10 | -5.52 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.01 | -64.24 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.70 | -57.67 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement