Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs WRGCX
NRGSX vs WRGCX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs WRGCX
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.19B
Macquarie Small Cap Growth C
Price$20.99
Change+$0.14 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
NRGSX vs WRGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. WRGCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Hold and WRGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. WRGCX (1.05B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than WRGCX: NRGSX (0.07) vs WRGCX (0.00). NRGSX was incepted earlier than WRGCX: NRGSX (13 years) vs WRGCX (33 years). WRGCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). WRGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WRGCX: NRGSX (0) vs WRGCX (1000). WRGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.42 vs. NRGSX (-14.62). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -11.01 vs. WRGCX (-54.79).
| NRGSX | WRGCX | NRGSX / WRGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.88 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.04 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.590 | 8.644 | -88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.19B | 1.05B | 779% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.62 | -4.42 | 331% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.10 | -2.14 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.01 | -54.79 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.70 | -55.19 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement