Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs WTSGX
NRGSX vs WTSGX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs WTSGX
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.19B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Gr Ret
Price$21.51
Change+$0.22 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets291.48M
NRGSX vs WTSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. WTSGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Hold and WTSGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. WTSGX (291M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than WTSGX: NRGSX (0.07) vs WTSGX (0.00). NRGSX was incepted earlier than WTSGX: NRGSX (13 years) vs WTSGX (12 years). WTSGX (1.04) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). WTSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WTSGX: NRGSX (0) vs WTSGX (2500). WTSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.40 vs. NRGSX (-14.62). WTSGX return over 5 years is better than : 16.91 vs. NRGSX (-11.01).
| NRGSX | WTSGX | NRGSX / WTSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.04 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.04 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.590 | 0.805 | -943% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.19B | 291M | 2,814% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.62 | -3.40 | 430% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.10 | 32.32 | -13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.01 | 16.91 | -65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.70 | 107.30 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers