NRIM
Price
$82.44
Change
+$1.78 (+2.21%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
277.78M
81 days until earnings call
TECTP
Price
$10.57
Change
-$0.03 (-0.28%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

NRIM vs TECTP

Header iconNRIM vs TECTP Comparison
Open Charts NRIM vs TECTPBanner chart's image
Northrim Ban
Price$82.44
Change+$1.78 (+2.21%)
Volume$16.22K
Capitalization277.78M
Tectonic Financial
Price$10.57
Change-$0.03 (-0.28%)
Volume$9.27K
CapitalizationN/A
NRIM vs TECTP Comparison Chart
Loading...
NRIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NRIM vs. TECTP commentary
May 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRIM is a Buy and TECTP is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 04, 2025
Stock price -- (NRIM: $82.44 vs. TECTP: $10.57)
Brand notoriety: NRIM and TECTP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NRIM: 57% vs. TECTP: 176%
Market capitalization -- NRIM: $277.78M vs. TECTP: $0
NRIM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $277.78M. TECTP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NRIM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTECTP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NRIM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TECTP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NRIM is a better buy in the long-term than TECTP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NRIM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NRIM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

NRIM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.00% price change this week, while TECTP (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

NRIM is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

TECTP is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRIM YTD gains are higher at: 6.656 vs. TECTP (4.573).
NRIMTECTPNRIM / TECTP
Capitalization278MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.6564.573146%
P/E Ratio11.03N/A-
Revenue130MN/A-
Total Cash31.3MN/A-
Total Debt33.1MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NRIM vs TECTP: Fundamental Ratings
NRIM
TECTP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4885
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8100
SMR RATING
1..100
12100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECTP's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NRIM (76) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TECTP’s stock grew significantly faster than NRIM’s over the last 12 months.

NRIM's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for TECTP (100) in the null industry. This means that NRIM’s stock grew significantly faster than TECTP’s over the last 12 months.

NRIM's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for TECTP (100) in the null industry. This means that NRIM’s stock grew significantly faster than TECTP’s over the last 12 months.

NRIM's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TECTP (48) in the null industry. This means that NRIM’s stock grew similarly to TECTP’s over the last 12 months.

NRIM's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TECTP (100) in the null industry. This means that NRIM’s stock grew somewhat faster than TECTP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NRIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NRIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JLVMX19.400.34
+1.78%
JPMorgan Large Cap Value R6
PJECX14.840.22
+1.50%
PGIM US Real Estate C
SCPIX46.500.68
+1.48%
DWS S&P 500 Index S
SUIIX55.730.79
+1.44%
DWS CROCI International Inst
GEFPX13.250.18
+1.38%
Gotham Enhanced 500 Plus Institutional

NRIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NRIM has been closely correlated with MBWM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NRIM jumps, then MBWM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRIM
1D Price
Change %
NRIM100%
+2.21%
MBWM - NRIM
82%
Closely correlated
+2.77%
PEBO - NRIM
81%
Closely correlated
+2.23%
BY - NRIM
81%
Closely correlated
+2.60%
FRME - NRIM
80%
Closely correlated
+3.09%
FCBC - NRIM
80%
Closely correlated
+2.24%
More

TECTP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TECTP has been loosely correlated with FHN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TECTP jumps, then FHN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TECTP
1D Price
Change %
TECTP100%
-0.22%
FHN - TECTP
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.34%
FITBI - TECTP
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
WAL - TECTP
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.61%
NRIM - TECTP
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
OCFCP - TECTP
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More