Ad is loading...
NRRSF
Price
$0.20
Change
+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
NSGCF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
Ad is loading...

NRRSF vs NSGCF

Header iconNRRSF vs NSGCF Comparison
Open Charts NRRSF vs NSGCFBanner chart's image
Norsemont Mining
Price$0.20
Change+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Volume$4K
CapitalizationN/A
NORTHSTAR GOLD
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20K
CapitalizationN/A
NRRSF vs NSGCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NRRSF vs. NSGCF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRRSF is a Hold and NSGCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (NRRSF: $0.20 vs. NSGCF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: NRRSF and NSGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NRRSF: 19% vs. NSGCF: 35%
Market capitalization -- NRRSF: $8.41M vs. NSGCF: $3.1M
NRRSF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.41M. NSGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NRRSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNSGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NRRSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NSGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NRRSF and NSGCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

NRRSF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.78% price change this week, while NSGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRRSF($8.41M) has a higher market cap than NSGCF($3.1M). NRRSF YTD gains are higher at: 88.952 vs. NSGCF (-11.350). NSGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.48M vs. NRRSF (-3.7M). NSGCF has more cash in the bank: 675K vs. NRRSF (51.2K). NSGCF has less debt than NRRSF: NSGCF (60K) vs NRRSF (1.54M). NRRSF (0) and NSGCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NRRSFNSGCFNRRSF / NSGCF
Capitalization8.41M3.1M272%
EBITDA-3.7M-1.48M250%
Gain YTD88.952-11.350-784%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash51.2K675K8%
Total Debt1.54M60K2,558%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NRRSF: Fundamental Ratings
NRRSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DEMSX23.24-0.02
-0.09%
DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap I
CIMFX25.65-0.12
-0.47%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529F1
FTVNX34.93-0.17
-0.48%
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Val Investor
FBBAX28.22-0.19
-0.67%
First Foundation Total Return A
RGGIX43.11-0.56
-1.28%
T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock I

NRRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NRRSF and GORIF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NRRSF and GORIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRRSF
1D Price
Change %
NRRSF100%
+7.24%
GORIF - NRRSF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBYSF - NRRSF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYPMF - NRRSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UGDIF - NRRSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.65%
NSGCF - NRRSF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NSGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSGCF and CALRF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSGCF and CALRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSGCF
1D Price
Change %
NSGCF100%
N/A
CALRF - NSGCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPTLF - NSGCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANGPY - NSGCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
GORIF - NSGCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGLDF - NSGCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-9.96%
More