Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSBCX vs VFFSX
NSBCX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts NSBCX vs VFFSX
Nuveen Dividend Growth C
Price$66.65
Change+$0.18 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.53B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$323.82
Change-$0.31 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.37T
NSBCX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBCX vs. VFFSX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBCX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.37T vs. NSBCX (6.53B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: VFFSX (1.18) vs NSBCX (0.15). NSBCX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: NSBCX (19 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). NSBCX (1.67) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). NSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). NSBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: NSBCX (2500) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.32 vs. NSBCX (2.77). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 99.18 vs. NSBCX (52.88).
| NSBCX | VFFSX | NSBCX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.01 | 16,700% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.01 | 16,700% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.393 | 12.668 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.53B | 1.37T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.18 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.77 | 17.32 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.89 | 70.68 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.88 | 99.18 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement