NSCIF
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.02 (-6.67%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
SEPJF
Price
$32.10
Change
-$1.42 (-4.24%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

NSCIF vs SEPJF

Header iconNSCIF vs SEPJF Comparison
Open Charts NSCIF vs SEPJFBanner chart's image
Nanalysis Scientific
Price$0.28
Change-$0.02 (-6.67%)
Volume$43K
CapitalizationN/A
Spectris
Price$32.10
Change-$1.42 (-4.24%)
Volume$104
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
NSCIF vs SEPJF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
NSCIF vs. SEPJF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSCIF is a Hold and SEPJF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (NSCIF: $0.28 vs. SEPJF: $32.10)
Brand notoriety: NSCIF and SEPJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSCIF: 116% vs. SEPJF: 8%
Market capitalization -- NSCIF: $43.61M vs. SEPJF: $4.69B
NSCIF [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] is valued at $43.61M. SEPJF’s [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] market capitalization is $4.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry ranges from $109.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry is $5.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSCIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSEPJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NSCIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SEPJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEPJF is a better buy in the long-term than NSCIF.

Price Growth

NSCIF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а -2.76% price change this week, while SEPJF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was -2.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was +261.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +151.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (+261.59% weekly)

This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEPJF($4.69B) has a higher market cap than NSCIF($43.6M). NSCIF YTD gains are higher at: 1.960 vs. SEPJF (-31.440). SEPJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 304M vs. NSCIF (-8.87M). SEPJF has more cash in the bank: 122M vs. NSCIF (1.76M). NSCIF has less debt than SEPJF: NSCIF (13.8M) vs SEPJF (293M). SEPJF has higher revenues than NSCIF: SEPJF (1.33B) vs NSCIF (23.9M).
NSCIFSEPJFNSCIF / SEPJF
Capitalization43.6M4.69B1%
EBITDA-8.87M304M-3%
Gain YTD1.960-31.440-6%
P/E RatioN/A25.64-
Revenue23.9M1.33B2%
Total Cash1.76M122M1%
Total Debt13.8M293M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SEPJF: Fundamental Ratings
SEPJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
51
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

NSCIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSCIF and SOTK have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSCIF and SOTK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSCIF
1D Price
Change %
NSCIF100%
+7.49%
SOTK - NSCIF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.00%
LCTC - NSCIF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIGL - NSCIF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
SOBR - NSCIF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
SEPJF - NSCIF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.32%
More

SEPJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SEPJF and HXGBY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEPJF and HXGBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEPJF
1D Price
Change %
SEPJF100%
-4.32%
HXGBY - SEPJF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
HXGBF - SEPJF
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.72%
NXTBF - SEPJF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QURT - SEPJF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOTK - SEPJF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.00%
More