It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NSCIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSIGL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NSCIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SIGL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
NSCIF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а +9.64% price change this week, while SIGL (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was +4.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -3.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.21%.
SIGL is expected to report earnings on Apr 20, 2023.
This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
NSCIF | SIGL | NSCIF / SIGL | |
Capitalization | 43.6M | 471K | 9,257% |
EBITDA | -8.87M | -178.81K | 4,958% |
Gain YTD | -29.856 | 20.769 | -144% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 23.9M | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 1.76M | 114 | 1,540,351% |
Total Debt | 13.8M | 12.4K | 111,290% |
SIGL | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NSCIF | SIGL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 6 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago68% | 13 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago81% | 6 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 7 days ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago87% | 2 days ago90% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
HUSV | 38.05 | -0.10 | -0.26% |
First Trust Hrzn MgdVolatil Domestic ETF | |||
IWB | 331.79 | -1.64 | -0.49% |
iShares Russell 1000 ETF | |||
FEMS | 38.65 | -0.23 | -0.59% |
First Trust Emerg Mkts SC AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
MMSC | 21.84 | -0.28 | -1.26% |
First Trust Multi-Manager Sm Cp Opps ETF | |||
ARKG | 24.70 | -0.53 | -2.10% |
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NSCIF and SOTK have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSCIF and SOTK's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NSCIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NSCIF | 100% | +2.58% | ||
SOTK - NSCIF | 9% Poorly correlated | -11.86% | ||
LCTC - NSCIF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SIGL - NSCIF | 5% Poorly correlated | -8.82% | ||
SEPJF - NSCIF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
SOBR - NSCIF | 3% Poorly correlated | -13.04% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SIGL and NSCIF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIGL and NSCIF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SIGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SIGL | 100% | +1.29% | ||
NSCIF - SIGL | 5% Poorly correlated | +10.77% | ||
LCTC - SIGL | 3% Poorly correlated | -17.16% | ||
NXTBF - SIGL | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
RNSHF - SIGL | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
QURT - SIGL | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
More |