NSFDF
Price
$0.63
Change
+$0.03 (+5.00%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
64.61M
PLSDF
Price
$2.87
Change
+$0.08 (+2.87%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
143.49M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSFDF vs PLSDF

Header iconNSFDF vs PLSDF Comparison
Open Charts NSFDF vs PLSDFBanner chart's image
NXT Energy Solutions
Price$0.63
Change+$0.03 (+5.00%)
Volume$21K
Capitalization64.61M
Pulse Seismic
Price$2.87
Change+$0.08 (+2.87%)
Volume$11.9K
Capitalization143.49M
NSFDF vs PLSDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NSFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSFDF vs. PLSDF commentary
Aug 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFDF is a Hold and PLSDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2025
Stock price -- (NSFDF: $0.63 vs. PLSDF: $2.87)
Brand notoriety: NSFDF and PLSDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSFDF: 173% vs. PLSDF: 49%
Market capitalization -- NSFDF: $64.61M vs. PLSDF: $143.49M
NSFDF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $64.61M. PLSDF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $143.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $52.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSFDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLSDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NSFDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PLSDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLSDF is a better buy in the long-term than NSFDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSFDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLSDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSFDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PLSDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLSDF is a better buy in the short-term than NSFDF.

Price Growth

NSFDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +4.00% price change this week, while PLSDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +0.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +3.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+3.50% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLSDF($143M) has a higher market cap than NSFDF($64.6M). NSFDF YTD gains are higher at: 481.485 vs. PLSDF (72.892). PLSDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 40.5M vs. NSFDF (4.13M). PLSDF has more cash in the bank: 25.9M vs. NSFDF (2.15M). PLSDF has less debt than NSFDF: PLSDF (212K) vs NSFDF (4.43M). PLSDF has higher revenues than NSFDF: PLSDF (49.4M) vs NSFDF (14.2M).
NSFDFPLSDFNSFDF / PLSDF
Capitalization64.6M143M45%
EBITDA4.13M40.5M10%
Gain YTD481.48572.892661%
P/E RatioN/A9.02-
Revenue14.2M49.4M29%
Total Cash2.15M25.9M8%
Total Debt4.43M212K2,090%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSFDF vs PLSDF: Fundamental Ratings
NSFDF
PLSDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8686
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6123
SMR RATING
1..100
9715
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3539
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9169
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLSDF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as NSFDF (58). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew similarly to NSFDF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NSFDF (61). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NSFDF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSFDF (97). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew significantly faster than NSFDF’s over the last 12 months.

NSFDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PLSDF (39). This means that NSFDF’s stock grew similarly to PLSDF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as NSFDF (91). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew similarly to NSFDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSFDFPLSDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPFX1.690.11
+6.96%
Standard Premium Finance Holdings, Inc.
TWODF1.28N/A
N/A
Taylor Wimpey Plc
CITZ32.00N/A
N/A
Citizens Bancshares Corp South Carolina
ACNFF25.08N/A
N/A
Amsterdam Commodities N.V.
OTSKY26.78-0.27
-1.00%
Otsuka Holdings Co. Ltd.

NSFDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSFDF and PSYTF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSFDF and PSYTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSFDF
1D Price
Change %
NSFDF100%
N/A
PSYTF - NSFDF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
MCCRF - NSFDF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
HGHAF - NSFDF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QSEP - NSFDF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
PLSDF - NSFDF
0%
Poorly correlated
+2.94%
More

PLSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLSDF and QSEP have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLSDF and QSEP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLSDF
1D Price
Change %
PLSDF100%
+2.94%
QSEP - PLSDF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
MCCRF - PLSDF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
PDER - PLSDF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.86%
PSYTF - PLSDF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
POFCF - PLSDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More