NSFDF
Price
$0.63
Change
+$0.03 (+5.00%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
64.61M
PSYTF
Price
$8.38
Change
-$0.09 (-1.06%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
658.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSFDF vs PSYTF

Header iconNSFDF vs PSYTF Comparison
Open Charts NSFDF vs PSYTFBanner chart's image
NXT Energy Solutions
Price$0.63
Change+$0.03 (+5.00%)
Volume$21K
Capitalization64.61M
Pason Systems
Price$8.38
Change-$0.09 (-1.06%)
Volume$11.11K
Capitalization658.06M
NSFDF vs PSYTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NSFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSFDF vs. PSYTF commentary
Aug 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFDF is a Hold and PSYTF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2025
Stock price -- (NSFDF: $0.63 vs. PSYTF: $8.38)
Brand notoriety: NSFDF and PSYTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSFDF: 173% vs. PSYTF: 158%
Market capitalization -- NSFDF: $64.61M vs. PSYTF: $658.06M
NSFDF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $64.61M. PSYTF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $658.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $52.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSFDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePSYTF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NSFDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PSYTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSYTF is a better buy in the long-term than NSFDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSFDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSYTF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSFDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PSYTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PSYTF is a better buy in the short-term than NSFDF.

Price Growth

NSFDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +4.00% price change this week, while PSYTF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +3.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +3.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+3.50% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSYTF($658M) has a higher market cap than NSFDF($64.6M). NSFDF YTD gains are higher at: 481.485 vs. PSYTF (-10.623). PSYTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 154M vs. NSFDF (4.13M). PSYTF has more cash in the bank: 69.3M vs. NSFDF (2.15M). NSFDF has less debt than PSYTF: NSFDF (4.43M) vs PSYTF (15.1M). PSYTF has higher revenues than NSFDF: PSYTF (423M) vs NSFDF (14.2M).
NSFDFPSYTFNSFDF / PSYTF
Capitalization64.6M658M10%
EBITDA4.13M154M3%
Gain YTD481.485-10.623-4,533%
P/E RatioN/A12.46-
Revenue14.2M423M3%
Total Cash2.15M69.3M3%
Total Debt4.43M15.1M29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSFDF vs PSYTF: Fundamental Ratings
NSFDF
PSYTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8614
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6162
SMR RATING
1..100
9753
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3575
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9125
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSYTF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NSFDF (58). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NSFDF’s over the last 12 months.

NSFDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as PSYTF (62). This means that NSFDF’s stock grew similarly to PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NSFDF (97). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NSFDF’s over the last 12 months.

NSFDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSYTF (75). This means that NSFDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSFDF (91). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew significantly faster than NSFDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSFDFPSYTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVLFX15.110.07
+0.47%
Cullen Value C
TPIAX15.18N/A
N/A
Timothy Plan International A
SENAX54.12N/A
N/A
Allspring Mid Cap Growth Fund - Cl A
AFNAX26.28N/A
N/A
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth A
MKVIX16.95N/A
N/A
MFS International Large Cap Value I

NSFDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSFDF and PSYTF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSFDF and PSYTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSFDF
1D Price
Change %
NSFDF100%
N/A
PSYTF - NSFDF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
MCCRF - NSFDF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
HGHAF - NSFDF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QSEP - NSFDF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
PLSDF - NSFDF
0%
Poorly correlated
+2.94%
More

PSYTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSYTF and NINE have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSYTF and NINE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSYTF
1D Price
Change %
PSYTF100%
-1.06%
NINE - PSYTF
23%
Poorly correlated
+7.44%
PUMP - PSYTF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.22%
CLB - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
ACDC - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
XPRO - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.01%
More