NSFDF
Price
$0.56
Change
-$0.07 (-11.11%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
58.18M
QSEP
Price
$0.24
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
117.88M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSFDF vs QSEP

Header iconNSFDF vs QSEP Comparison
Open Charts NSFDF vs QSEPBanner chart's image
NXT Energy Solutions
Price$0.56
Change-$0.07 (-11.11%)
Volume$9.44K
Capitalization58.18M
QS Energy
Price$0.24
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.5K
Capitalization117.88M
NSFDF vs QSEP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NSFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QSEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSFDF vs. QSEP commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFDF is a Hold and QSEP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (NSFDF: $0.56 vs. QSEP: $0.24)
Brand notoriety: NSFDF and QSEP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSFDF: 78% vs. QSEP: 9%
Market capitalization -- NSFDF: $58.18M vs. QSEP: $117.88M
NSFDF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $58.18M. QSEP’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $117.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $53.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSFDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQSEP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NSFDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QSEP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QSEP is a better buy in the long-term than NSFDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSFDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QSEP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSFDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QSEP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NSFDF and QSEP are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NSFDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -7.84% price change this week, while QSEP (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -0.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +3.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.23%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+3.67% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QSEP($118M) has a higher market cap than NSFDF($58.2M). NSFDF YTD gains are higher at: 411.457 vs. QSEP (59.867). NSFDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.13M vs. QSEP (-12.51M). NSFDF has more cash in the bank: 2.15M vs. QSEP (778K). QSEP has less debt than NSFDF: QSEP (1.38M) vs NSFDF (4.43M). NSFDF has higher revenues than QSEP: NSFDF (14.2M) vs QSEP (0).
NSFDFQSEPNSFDF / QSEP
Capitalization58.2M118M49%
EBITDA4.13M-12.51M-33%
Gain YTD411.45759.867687%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue14.2M0-
Total Cash2.15M778K277%
Total Debt4.43M1.38M321%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSFDF vs QSEP: Fundamental Ratings
NSFDF
QSEP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8676
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6147
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NSFDF's Valuation (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QSEP (98). This means that NSFDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

QSEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as NSFDF (61). This means that QSEP’s stock grew similarly to NSFDF’s over the last 12 months.

NSFDF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as QSEP (100). This means that NSFDF’s stock grew similarly to QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

NSFDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as QSEP (36). This means that NSFDF’s stock grew similarly to QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

NSFDF's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as QSEP (100). This means that NSFDF’s stock grew similarly to QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSFDFQSEP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QSEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNPMF0.560.04
+8.26%
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
RTMVF10.19N/A
N/A
Rightmove Plc
JZRIF0.19N/A
N/A
JZR GOLD INC.
SPNUF2.67N/A
N/A
Spirent Communications Plc
HYDTF2.48-0.07
-2.65%
Hydreight Technologies Inc

NSFDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSFDF and PSYTF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSFDF and PSYTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSFDF
1D Price
Change %
NSFDF100%
-12.04%
PSYTF - NSFDF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCCRF - NSFDF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HGHAF - NSFDF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QSEP - NSFDF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
PLSDF - NSFDF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
More

QSEP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QSEP and PLSDF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QSEP and PLSDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QSEP
1D Price
Change %
QSEP100%
-1.24%
PLSDF - QSEP
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
TAGP - QSEP
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KEGX - QSEP
6%
Poorly correlated
+15.26%
PDER - QSEP
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.29%
NSFDF - QSEP
6%
Poorly correlated
-12.04%
More