Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFDX vs RCCTX
NSFDX vs RCCTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFDX vs. RCCTX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFDX is a StrongBuy and RCCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCCTX has more cash in the bank: 15.1B vs. NSFDX (2.21M). NSFDX pays higher dividends than RCCTX: NSFDX (2.92) vs RCCTX (2.21). NSFDX was incepted earlier than RCCTX: NSFDX (8 years) vs RCCTX (18 years). NSFDX (3.49) is less costly to investors than RCCTX (0.94). NSFDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RCCTX (5.00). RCCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFDX: RCCTX (250) vs NSFDX (1000000). RCCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.04 vs. NSFDX (2.17). RCCTX return over 5 years is better than : 19.91 vs. NSFDX (-5.32).
| NSFDX | RCCTX | NSFDX / RCCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.94 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.49 | 0.94 | 371% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.466 | 7.976 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.21M | 15.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.92 | 2.21 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.17 | 9.04 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.60 | 21.57 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.32 | 19.91 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.18 | - |