Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFDX vs RCCTX
NSFDX vs RCCTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFDX vs. RCCTX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFDX is a Hold and RCCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCCTX has more cash in the bank: 15.1B vs. NSFDX (1.01M). NSFDX pays higher dividends than RCCTX: NSFDX (2.92) vs RCCTX (2.21). NSFDX was incepted earlier than RCCTX: NSFDX (8 years) vs RCCTX (18 years). NSFDX (3.49) is less costly to investors than RCCTX (0.94). NSFDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RCCTX (5.00). RCCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFDX: RCCTX (250) vs NSFDX (1000000). RCCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.25 vs. NSFDX (1.59). RCCTX return over 5 years is better than : 18.65 vs. NSFDX (-7.90).
| NSFDX | RCCTX | NSFDX / RCCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.94 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.49 | 0.94 | 371% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.113 | 8.578 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01M | 15.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.92 | 2.21 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.59 | 9.25 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.98 | 21.27 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.90 | 18.65 | -42% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement