Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFKX vs RBITX
NSFKX vs RBITX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFKX vs. RBITX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFKX is a StrongBuy and RBITX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBITX has more cash in the bank: 37B vs. NSFKX (21.5M). NSFKX pays higher dividends than RBITX: NSFKX (1.39) vs RBITX (0.32). NSFKX was incepted earlier than RBITX: NSFKX (8 years) vs RBITX (18 years). RBITX (1.46) is less costly to investors than NSFKX (1.25). NSFKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. RBITX (5.00). RBITX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFKX: RBITX (250) vs NSFKX (1000000). RBITX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.50 vs. NSFKX (6.88). RBITX return over 5 years is better than : 45.55 vs. NSFKX (36.29).
| NSFKX | RBITX | NSFKX / RBITX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.46 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.46 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.385 | 9.032 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5M | 37B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.32 | 427% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 11.50 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.96 | 35.01 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.29 | 45.55 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement