Ad is loading...
NSFKX vs RBITX
NSFKX vs RBITX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFKX vs. RBITX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFKX is a Hold and RBITX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBITX has more cash in the bank: 35.1B vs. NSFKX (27.3M). NSFKX pays higher dividends than RBITX: NSFKX (1.08) vs RBITX (0.58). NSFKX was incepted earlier than RBITX: NSFKX (8 years) vs RBITX (18 years). NSFKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. RBITX (1.00). RBITX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFKX: RBITX (250) vs NSFKX (1000000). RBITX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.99 vs. NSFKX (12.94). RBITX return over 5 years is better than : 27.45 vs. NSFKX (18.40).
| NSFKX | RBITX | NSFKX / RBITX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.798 | 1.985 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.3M | 35.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.58 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.94 | 14.99 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.75 | 6.29 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.40 | 27.45 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers