Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFKX vs RBITX
NSFKX vs RBITX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFKX vs. RBITX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFKX is a Hold and RBITX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBITX has more cash in the bank: 38.3B vs. NSFKX (8.02M). NSFKX pays higher dividends than RBITX: NSFKX (1.33) vs RBITX (0.31). NSFKX was incepted earlier than RBITX: NSFKX (8 years) vs RBITX (18 years). RBITX (1.46) is less costly to investors than NSFKX (1.25). NSFKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. RBITX (5.00). RBITX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFKX: RBITX (250) vs NSFKX (1000000). RBITX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.52 vs. NSFKX (-41.65). RBITX return over 5 years is better than : 41.58 vs. NSFKX (-30.17).
| NSFKX | RBITX | NSFKX / RBITX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.46 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.46 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -42.838 | 12.109 | -354% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.02M | 38.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.31 | 431% |
| Returns for 1 year | -41.65 | 15.52 | -268% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.60 | 39.07 | -68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.17 | 41.58 | -73% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.08 | - |